View 4539 Cases Against Punjab National Bank
Ram Kishore Prasad Singh, filed a consumer case on 22 Feb 2016 against The Senior Manager, Punjab National Bank & Others in the Muzaffarpur Consumer Court. The case no is CC/86/2014 and the judgment uploaded on 08 Jun 2017.
District Consumer Forum, Muzaffarpur
Complain Case No. –86/2014
Ram Kishore Prasad Singh, S/o late- Basawan Singh, R/o Mohalla- Shyam Nagar, Bhagwanpur, N.H.-28 (Behind Pandey Petrol Pump) P.S.-Sadar, District-Muzaffarpur …………………………………….……………………...……Complainant
V/s
Date of order- 22-02-2016
Present.
President,
Consumer Forum Muzaffarpur
Member
Consumer Forum Muzaffarpur
For complainants- Sri Ashwani Kumar - Advocate
For opposite party- Sri Raj Kishor Uppal & A.P. Gupta - Advocates
Order
The complainant has filed this case on 01-07-2014 for his claim of Rs. 2,79,367./- including Rs. 86,249/- basic pension dearness Rs. 65767/- total Rs. 1,52006 and its interest @ of 18 % Rs. 27361/- and Rs. 1 lakh for physical, mental, harassment .
The case of complainant appears from his complaint petition supported with an affidavit that he was Rtd. From the post of Additional District and Sessions Judge, Patna on 31-08-2001his pension was fix from A.G. Bihar vide pension order no.- 312999 and the pension provider is opposite party the Punjab National Bank J.L. Road, Muzaffarpur. And the amount of pension and arrear, if any is to be credited in his SB A/c no.- 0334000300126217. He has further alleged that time to time pension amount increase and lastly there was 10 % increased in the basic pension on attaining 70 years of age vide letter no.- 3A-2 PAY Pu- 12/2009 (part-II)- 7514/VI-II of Government of Bihar Department of finance under resolution dated 23-07-2013. The applicant completed 70 years of age on 13-08-2011 and he became entitle for 10 % increase in the basic pension from 14-08-2011. The State Bank of India paid enhanced 10 % pension with arrear to its pensioners of Judicial Service in October , November 2013 itself the enhanced pension was not paid to the applicant from which he wrote a letter dated 21-11-2013 to the treasury officer Muzaffarpur for directing opposite party Bank to pay his pension at enhanced rate. The treasury officer vide letter no. – 4208 25-11-2013 directed opposite party no.-1 to take step for payment of enhanced pension, further the complainant on several times personally as well as on telephone requested the opposite party for the said payment lastly the complainant talk the Senior Manager, CPPC on dated 01-03-2014 on his official telephone no.- 06122221234 and he directed him to put his grievances before the opposite party no.-1 not before him as such the complainant send a letter notice dated 21-04-2014 for making payment, but they had not taken care of his request. The complainant is patient of sugar and crossed the normal level examined by several Pathology which was caused due to ill mannered talked with opposite party no.-2 resulting in agony, anxiety, stress and tensions. The applicant is consumer of opposite party obviously there is deficiency in service of opposite party accordingly he has filed this case and demanded payment of enhanced with arrear pension with interest @ 18 % and have filed this case with aforesaid claim.
The complainant has filed Bihar Gazette notification dated 24-07-2013 showing that he is entitle for enhanced pension at enhanced rate of 10 % as he acquire 70 years of age. He has filed Xerox copy of letter dated 25-11-2013 issued by Treasury Officer , Muzaffarpur letter dated 21-11-2013, send by him toTreasury Officer, letter dated 08-01-2014 from Chief Manager, C.P.P. Patna for grant of Additional Pension ( 10 %BP) on completion of 70 years to the complainant, letter dated 21-04-2014 , send to Senior Manager, P.N.B. Muzaffarpur by the complainant, Xerox copy of pathological test from several pathology, medical prescription’s is letter dated 18-07-2009.. send by him Xerox copy of pass book which are annexure 1 to VIII
In this case opposite party appeared and has filed his written statement dated 22-01-2015 alleging therein that case is unwarranted illegal without jurisdiction and he has filed this case to harass opposite party and lower down prestige and submitted that the pension amount is regularly being credited in the account of complainant and has further submitted that the work of consultation and correspondence is time taking work, as soon as these have been completed the sum of Rs. 1,49,000/- has been credited in the saving account of complainant on 17-07-2014 and the rest amount shall be credited as soon as when its instructed. The opposite party has denied the dragging of complainant for the payment of his enhanced pension by the opposite party no.1 & 2 and has further submitted that it is under the strict prove of complainant that his enhancement of payment of pension @ 10 % arises after attaining the age of 70 years which has matured on 13-08-2011 as on the aforesaid ground the opposite party has prayed to dismiss the case with compensation of Rs. 50,000/- against the complainant.
The opposite party has filed Xerox copy of account laser enquiry from which it appears that Rs. 1,49,317 has been credited on 07-07-2014 as pension arrear in the account of complainant and further they have credited Rs. 2577/- on 05-08-14 as pension D.A arrears from July,2014.
Considering the facts, circumstances, material available with the record the complainant became entitle for 10 % enhancement in his pension as per notification as annexure- 1 filed by him. He has Rtd. Judicial officer from service on 31-08-2001 as per allegation his enhancement in pension @ 10 % after attaining the age of 70 years, he is entitle to get the said benefit from 31-08-2011. It appears from written statement filed by the opposite party that after consultation of correspondence time was taken and on completion of work as soon as completed. He has credited Rs. 1,49,000/- in his Saving Account on 17-07-2014 and as objected that is under strict of complainant that his enhancement of payment of pension @ of 10 % arises after attaining age of 70 years which was matured on 13-08-2011. In this regard the complainant has alleged that he has completed his 70 years of age on 13-08-2011 as such he became entitle for 10 % increase from 14-08-2011 for which he has written a letter dated 21-11-2013 to the Treasury Officer, Muzaffarpur and the Treasury Officer vide his latter no.- 32018 dated 25-11-2013 directed opposite party no.-1 to take step for payment of enhanced pension but the opposite party as not taken care of the direction of the treasury officers and the complainant was dragged for so many time and lastly admittedly the opposite party has credited the said amount on 17-07-2014 as such clear cut discrepancy arises against the opposite party for delay in payment of enhanced date in pension @ of 10 % from 31-08-2011 till 17-07-2014 for which the complainant is entitle be caused of certain reasonable time limitation. The opposite party has taken about three years in payment .
Considering the facts, circumstances, material available with the record we find that the case of complainant is maintainable and he is entitle for discrepancy and harassment done by the opposite party.
Accordingly the case is allowed and the opposite party directed to pay interest @ 8 % from 31-08-2011 till 17-07-2014 against the monthly arrears accrues @ of 10 % in his pension and the opposite parties are further directed to pay Rs. 20,000/- as physical, mental harassment, as well as litigation cost. Both the payment should be made within 30 days of the order otherwise the complainant is entitle to get it recover from the process of law.
Member President
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.