West Bengal

Kolkata-II(Central)

CC/79/2021

Mamata Pradhan - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Secretary,Humara India Credit Co Operative Society Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

Self

24 Aug 2022

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
KOLKATA UNIT - II (CENTRAL)
8-B, NELLIE SENGUPTA SARANI, 7TH FLOOR,
KOLKATA-700087.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/79/2021
( Date of Filing : 29 Jan 2021 )
 
1. Mamata Pradhan
6/1B/1B,Creek Lane, P.S. Muchipara, Kolkata-700014.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Secretary,Humara India Credit Co Operative Society Ltd.
Mangal Jyoti, 227/2, A.J.C.Bose Road, Kolkata-700020, P.S. Bhawanipur.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Swapan Kumar Mahanty PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Sahana Ahmed Basu MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. Ashoke Kumar Ganguly MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 24 Aug 2022
Final Order / Judgement

FINAL ORDER/JUDGMENT           

SHRI SWAPAN KUMAR MAHANTY,   PRESIDENT

 

 

The facts, as stated in the complaint and emerged from the documents attached with it,  are that  Humara India Credit Co operative society Ltd. is a Financial Institution. OP is the Secretary  of Humara India Credit Co operative society Ltd. Complainant invested  Rs. 39,074/- to the OP  on 30.07.2016 for a period of 36 months.  OP issued  certificate bearing No. 605001601385  to the complainant. The maturity date of the certificate is 30.07.2019   and its maturity value is Rs. 60,018/-. Despite repeated request, the OP did not refund the matured amount. Complainant issued notice dated 21.10.2020 requesting the OP to refund the matured amount.  Notice was unattended.  Complainant further alleges that there is gross deficiency in service and unfair trade practice on the part of the OP.

In view of the gross deficiency in service and unfair trade practices of the OP,  complainant has filed  the instant  consumer complaint seeking payment of matured amount along with compensation and litigation cost.

            Despite service of notice of the complaint, the OP did not turn up to contest the case by filing WV within the statutory period as provided under the CP Act, 2019.  

Complainant has filed his  evidence supporting the allegations made in the complaint petition. Complainant has also filed various documents in support of his case. Despite given opportunities the OP failed to file their WV denying the allegations of the complainant.  

            We have considered the argument of the Ld. Advocate for the complainant and examined the record.

            It is not in dispute that the complainant invested Rs. 39,074/- to the OP against the certificate bearing No. 605001601385  dated  30.07.2016. The maturity date of those certificates is 30.07.2019. Despite several request and notice dated 21.10.2020 OP did not pay the matured  amount to the complainant. OP is fully aware that they are liable to pay the matured amount to the complainant on its maturity. Complainant invested his hard-earned money with the OP. The OP is deliberate to make illegal gains and to deprive the complainant from her lawful right. In fact, the OP withhold the maturity amount which no doubt deceitful manner of trade.

OP has not filed their WV denying the allegations made in the complaint petition. Complainant in his affidavit did support the allegations made out in the complaint. Therefore, it cannot be said that complainant has failed to prove deficiency in service and unfair trade practice of the OP. The act of the OP is a clear case of deception, which resulted in the injury and loss of opportunity to the complainant. Had the complainant not invested his money to the OP, she would have invested the same elsewhere. Complainant cannot be wait indefinitely to get the matured amount. Complainant has suffered mental agony and harassment. It is settled principal of law that the compensation should be commensurate with loss of suffered and it should be just, fair and reasonable and not arbitrary. To get relief, complainant has to wage a long drawn and tedious legal battle. In these circumstances, the complainant is entitled to get the maturity amount of Humara India Credit Co operative society Ltd.  along with compensation and litigation cost.

Based on the discussion above, the Consumer Case is allowed ex parte in part against the OP with the following directions :-

  1. OP is directed to pay matured amount of Rs. 60,018/- (Rupees Sixty thousand eighteen) only to the complainant.
  2. OP is further directed to pay Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) only as compensation to the complainant on account of mental agony and physical harassment.
  3. OP is  also directed to pay Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees five thousand) only towards litigation cost to the complainant.

The above directions be complied by the OP within a period of 90 days from today. For failure or omission in compliance within the stipulated period, the complainant shall be at liberty to put the order in execution as per CP Act.

Copy of the judgment be supplied to the parties free of cost as per CP Act. Upload the judgment on the website of this Commission for perusal of the parties.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Swapan Kumar Mahanty]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Sahana Ahmed Basu]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Ashoke Kumar Ganguly]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.