Kerala

Kollam

CC/88/2023

S.Sunilkumar, - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Secretary, - Opp.Party(s)

21 Mar 2023

ORDER

Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
Railway Station Road
Karbala Junction
Kollam-691001
Kerala.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/88/2023
( Date of Filing : 08 Mar 2023 )
 
1. S.Sunilkumar,
Alayil,Mayyanad.P.O,Kollam-691303.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Secretary,
Dep.of State Railways,Govt.of Kerala,Thiruvananthapuram-695001.
2. Divisional Manager,
TVM Divisional Office,TVM-695001.
3. Station Master,
Railway Station, Kollam-691001.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. S.K.SREELA PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. SANDHYA RANI.S MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. STANLY HAROLD MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 21 Mar 2023
Final Order / Judgement

                              IN  THE  DISTRICT  CONSUMER  DISPUTES  REDRESSAL

                                                       COMMISSION,  KOLLAM

 

                                                            PRESENT

               SMT. S.K.SREELA, B.A.L, LL.B,  PRESIDENT

                            SMT.SANDHYA RANI, BSC, LL.B,  MEMBER

                           SRI. STANLY HAROLD, BA, LL.B,  MEMBER

               

                                                   CC.No.88/2023

                           ORDER DATED  21ST  DAY OF MARCH 2023

 

BETWEEN

S.Sunil Kumar                                       :                  Complainant

Alayil

Mayyanad P.O

Kollam-691303

 

AND

  1. The Secretary                           :                                      Opposite parties

         Department of State Railways

        Govt.of Kerala

       Thiruvananthapuram:695001.

  1. Divisional Manager

        Thiruvananthapuram Divisional Office

        Thiruvananthapuram- 695001.

  1.  Station Master

          Railway station

          Kollam-691001.

 

 

 

ORDER

S.K SREELA, B.A.L, LL.B, PRESIDENT

                Complainant absent.  On going through the complaint it is seen that this complaint is with regard to fixation of fare.  It is a settled position that question of pricing cannot be gone into by the District Commission constituted under the Consumer Protection Act.

          Hence, as the District Commission cannot go into the reasonableness of pricing of services, it is found that this Commission has no jurisdiction to entertain this complaint and the complaint is found to be not maintainable before this Commission.

          In the result, complaint is dismissed as not maintainable before this Commission with liberty to the complaint to approach appropriate legal authority for the redressal of his grievances if any.

 

          Dated this the 21st day of March 2023.

 

 

​                                                                                

                                                    S.K.SREELA  : Sd/-

                                                   (President)

                                                                SANDHYA RANI  : Sd/-

                                                                 (Member)

                                                               STANLY HAROLD  :Sd/-

                                                                   (Member)

                                                            Forwarded/by Order

                                                           Senior Superintendent

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. S.K.SREELA]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. SANDHYA RANI.S]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. STANLY HAROLD]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.