Kerala

Kollam

CC/199/2019

Aravindakshan Pillai.R, - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Secretary, - Opp.Party(s)

Adv.P.K.SYAMALADEVI

13 Nov 2019

ORDER

Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum
Civil Station , Kollam-691013.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/199/2019
( Date of Filing : 27 Aug 2019 )
 
1. Aravindakshan Pillai.R,
S/o.Raghavakurup,Souparnika,Udayasree Nagar,House No.30,Kadakampally Lane,Vadakkevila,Madannada,Kollam.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Secretary,
Sopanam,The Quilon Public Library & Research Centre, Reg.No.76/73,Kollam-691001.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.M.MUHAMMED IBRAHIM PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. SANDHYA RANI.S MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. STANLY HAROLD MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 13 Nov 2019
Final Order / Judgement

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL  FORUM, KOLLAM

Dated this the    13th   Day of  November  2019

 

Present: -    Sri.E.M.Muhammed Ibrahim, B.A, LL.M. President

                   Smt.S.Sandhya Rani, BSc,LL.B, Member

                   Sri.Stanly Harold, B.A,LLB, Member

                                               

                                                            CC No.199/19

Aravindakshan Pillai.R                                :         Complainant

S/o Raghavakurup

Souparnika, Udayasree Nagar

House No.30, Kadakampally Lane,

Vadakkevila, Madannada, Kollam.

[By Adv.P.K.Syamaladevi]

V/s

The Secretary,                                             :         Opposite party

Sopanam

The Quilon Public Library & Research Centre

Reg.No.76/73

Kollam-691001.

 

FAIR  ORDER

Sri.Stanly Harold, B.A,LLB, Member

          This is a case based on a consumer complaint filed u/s 12 of the Consumer Protection Act 1986 against the opposite party praying to refund the amount paid  in connection with   booking of Auditorium for the marriage of his daughter.

          According to the complainant he had booked the Sopanam Auditorium on 27.11.2017 for conducting marriage of his daughter which was fixed to be held on 23.08.2018 and booked Saraswathi hall for marriage reception fixed to be held on 22.08.2018.   The complainant had paid an advance of Rs.35400/- on 27.11.17 for the auditorium and Rs.1500/- for the waste disposal.  On 19.01.18 the complainant paid Rs.10000/- for Saraswathy hall for the purpose of marriage reception on 22.08.18    and    on    20.07.18    paid   Rs.3000/- as  rent of  the dining hall for the

2

marriage reception.  The complainant altogether paid Rs.49000/- to the opposite party who is the Secretary, Sopanam, The Quilon Public Library & Research Centre for which receipts were also issued by the opposite party.  The marriage was originally  fixed to be conducted  on 23.08.2018 and accordingly  the complainant had made  the booking of  the hall as aforesaid.  Unfortunately the state of Kerala was gripped with a severe and unprecedented natural calamity of floods from 15.08.18 onwards.  The flood worstly affected area is Aluva where the bride    groom    is    residing.      Due    to this calamities both families arrived at  a conclusion   to postpone the marriage to another day.  Therefore    the complainant had requested in writing to   the opposite party on 20.08.2018 informing about the unfortunate situation that the complainant and family were placed due to the unforeseen floods and that  the marriage ceremony was adjourned and requested the  opposite party to allow the very same halls to be used on another convenient day fixed by the families and the same  was agreed by the opposite party and assured to allot the halls on another day.  Thereafter the complaint approached the opposite party  to make available the convenient dates for fixing the marriage.  But to the  surprise of the complainant, the opposite party demanded  rent afresh stating that rent already paid will not be refunded or readjusted.  The complainant had made every efforts to convince the opposite about the natural calamity and the consequences occurred in whole state of Kerala in writing.  However there were no lapses or any latches on the part of  the complainant.  The opposite party is not at all justified in not adjusting the rent already paid by the complainant as rent for a fresh date especially in the situation wherein the complainant is also a victim of the floods.  The opposite party refused to accept the request of  the complainant  without any    reasonable cause.  The complainant were constrained to conduct  the

3

marriage in another auditorium, Ushus, Pallimukku for which  he had incurred expense of Rs.83,000/- for the Auditorium.  It is only because of the unfair trade practice and deficiency in service on  the  part of the opposite party.  Hence the complaint.

          Inspite of receipt of notices opposite party never appeared before the Forum nor filed any version   and remain set exparte.

          Complainant filed affidavit by re-iterating the averments in the complaint and got marked Ext.P1 to Ext.P11 documents.  Out of the 11 documents got marked in evidence.  Ext.P1 is the   Wedding card relating to the marriage of the daughter of the complainant, Ext.P2 is the  receipt dated 27.11.2017  issued by opposite party by receiving  Rs. 35400/- towards the advance of rent of the auditorium. Ext.P3 is the receipt dated 27.11.17 issued by opposite party by receiving Rs.1500/-  towards waste disposal.  Ext.P4 is the receipt dated 19.01.2018 issued by opposite party by receiving Rs.10000/-  being the rent of  Saraswathi hall for reception. Ext.P5 is the  receipt  dated 20.07.2018 issued by opposite party by receiving Rs. 3000/-  being the rent of dining hall. Ext.P6 is the Advocate notice addressed to opposite party dated 27.11.18 issued  on behalf of  the complainant. Ext.P7 is the Postal receipt dated 27.11.18 evidencing the sending lawyer notice. Ext.P8 is the postal acknowledgement card signed by opposite party evidencing the receipt of lawyer notice. Ext.P9 is the copy of request dated 20.08.18 given to opposite party by the complainant. Ext.P10 is the copy of cash bill dated 12.12.2018 issued by the manager of Ushus Auditorium.  Ext.P11 is the receipt dated 15.10.18 issued by the Manager of Ushus auditorium by receiving Rs.10,000/- as booking advance.

4

Heard the counsel for  the complainant and  perused the records.

The unchallenged averments in the affidavit coupled with Ext.P1 to P11 documents would establish the case of the complainant. It is also clear from the available materials that  as the opposite party failed to allot  required  hall and other facilities  for conducting marriage of the daughter of the complainant which was postponed due to worst natural calamities in the State.  It is clear from the available materials  that    opposite party    refused  the  request of complainant to refund or readjust the rent amount collected from  the complainant in advance while    booking   the hall.  Hence it is clear that there is deficiency in service and unfair trade practice on the side of the opposite party.  It is also clear from the facts and circumstances of the case that as the opposite party failed to allot the hall and connected facilities to the postponed date of marriage the complainant has sustained mental agony apart from monitory loss and therefore the  complainant is  entitled to get the reliefs sought for. 

1. In the result the complaint stands allowed. Directing   the  opposite party to refund the amount of  Rs.49900/- being the amount  paid for booking the auditorium on 27.11.17 and allied charges.

2. The opposite party is further  directed to pay  Rs.25000/- being  compensation for the mental agony sustained to the complainant.

3. Opposite party is also directed to pay Rs.5000/- being costs of the complainant.

 

 

5

The opposite party is directed to pay the amount awarded under relief (1) to (3) within 30 days from the date of  receipt of a copy of this order failing which the complainant is entitled to realize Rs.74900/- (49900+25000) with interest at the rate of  12% per annum from the date of complaint till realization along with costs Rs.5000/- from the opposite party and the  assets  of the opposite party under the provisions of Consumer Protection Act.

Dictated to the  Confidential Assistant  Smt. Deepa.S transcribed and typed by her corrected by me and pronounced in the  Open Forum on this the  13th    day of  November  2019.    

E.M.MuhammedIbrahim:Sd/-

S.SandhyaRani:Sd/-

Stanly Harold:Sd/-

Forwarded/by Order

                                                                        Senior Superintendent

INDEX

Documents marked for the complainant

Ext.P1:-Wedding card

Ext.P2:- Receipt dated 27.11.17

Ext.P3:-Receipt dated 27.11.17

Ext.P4:-Receipt dated 19.01.18

Ext.P5:-Receipt dated  20.07.18.

Ext.P6:-Advocate notice

Ext.P7:-Postal receipt

Ext.P8:-Postal acknowledgement card

Ext.P9:-Copy of request dated 20.08.18

Ext.P10:-Copy of cash bill

Ext.P11:-Receipt dated 15.10.18

E.M.MuhammedIbrahim:Sd/-

S.SandhyaRani:Sd/-

Stanly Harold:Sd/-

Forwarded/by Order

                                                                       Senior Superintendent

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.M.MUHAMMED IBRAHIM]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. SANDHYA RANI.S]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. STANLY HAROLD]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.