Kerala

Idukki

CC/09/121

A thomas(Ex army) - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Secretary - Opp.Party(s)

24 Aug 2009

ORDER


CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, IDUKKIConsumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Idukki, Kuyilimala, Painavu PO-685603
CONSUMER CASE NO. 09 of 121
1. A thomas(Ex army)82, Palathinkal House, Kumily P.o, IdukkiIdukki DistrictKerala ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. The SecretaryKumily Grama Panchayat, KumilyIdukki DistrictKerala2. The Junior superintendent,Kumily grama Panchayat, KumilyIdukki DistrictKerala ...........Respondent(s)


For the Appellant :
For the Respondent :

Dated : 24 Aug 2009
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

 

BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, IDUKKI

Dated this the 24th day of August, 2009


 

Present:

SRI.LAIJU RAMAKRISHNAN PRESIDENT

SMT.SHEELA JACOB MEMBER

SMT.BINDU SOMAN MEMBER


 

C.C No.121/2009

Between

Complainant : A. Thomas (Ex.Army)

Palathinkal House,

Kumily P.O.

Idukki District.

Pin: 685 509.

And

Opposite Parties : 1. The Secretary,

Kumily Grama Panchayat Office,

Kumily.

2. The Junior Superintendent,

Kumily Grama Panchayat Office,

Kumily.

O R D E R

SRI.LAIJU RAMAKRISHNAN(PRESIDENT)


 

Complainant appeared directly. Opposite party also appeared directly. Complainant filed a withdrawal petition, because the application for getting Panchayath licence is for the plan of the complainant and his brother. There is violation in the rules, in the construction of the, building of the complainant's brother. Complainant is ready to give seperate application for his own building to the Panchayath. The opposite parties are also ready to settle the matter, if the complainant applies properly and if there is no violation in the construction of the complainant's building.


 

Hence the petition dismissed.


 

Pronounced in the Open Forum on this the 24th day of August, 2009.

Sd/-

SRI. LAIJU RAMAKRISHNAN(PRESIDENT) Sd/-

SMT. SHEELA JACOB(MEMBER)

Sd/-

SMT. BINDU SOMAN(MEMBER)

 


 


 


HONORABLE Sheela Jacob, MemberHONORABLE Laiju Ramakrishnan, PRESIDENTHONORABLE Bindu Soman, Member