Kerala

Alappuzha

CC/153/2010

Joseph Job - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Secretary, S.N.D.P Sakha Yogam Branch No. 363 - Opp.Party(s)

30 Nov 2010

ORDER

 
CC NO. 153 Of 2010
 
1. Joseph Job
Kachamkodam House, Attuvathala, Alappuzha
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Secretary, S.N.D.P Sakha Yogam Branch No. 363
Kakkazham, Alappuzha
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONORABLE JIMMY KORAH PRESIDENT
 HONORABLE K.Anirudhan Member
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

 

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, ALAPPUZHA

Tuesday the 30th day of  November, 2010

Filed on 22.7.2010

Present

  1. Sri. Jimmy Korah (President)
  2. Sri. K. Anirudhan (Member)
  3. Smt. Shajitha Beevi (Member)

in

C.C.No.153/10

between

Complainant:-                                             Opposite Parties:-

 

Sri. Joseph Job                                                       1.         SNDP Sakha No.363
Kachamkodam House                                                        Rep. its Secretary,

Nedumudi  P.O., Attuvathala                                              Kakkazhom, Neerkkunnam

Alappuzha                                                                          Alappuzha

(By Adv. Laly Joseph)

                                                                              2.         Sri.K.Bhaskaran, Secretary

                                                                                          SNDP Sakha Yogam No.363

                                                                                          Kakkazhom, S/o Kesavan

                                                            Anavelil House

                                                            Neerkkunnam, Alappuzha

                                                           (By Adv. A.T. Pradeepkumar)

 

O R D E R

SMT. N.SHAJITHA BEEVI (MEMBER)

          

Sri. Joseph Job has filed this complaint before the Forum on 22.07.2010 alleging deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties. The brief facts of the allegations of the complainant are as follows:- The 2nd   opposite party is the Secretary  of the first opposite party – SNDP Sakha Yogam No. 363, Kakkazhom. The 2nd opposite party has assured her that she will invest the funds in different ventures and make profits thereof will be distributed among the investors  @ 18% per annum payable on monthly basis.    The entire amount of the Trust is being carried out by the Secretary.  He had deposited a total sum of Rs.6,00,000/- (Rupees six lakhs only) before the Trust on 17.7.2006.  The opposite parties had issued Pass book showing the deposit of the same. The opposite parties failed to pay the interest or deposited amount till date, even though he had requested to return the amount,  he filed this complaint seeking relief.

            2.   Notices were issued to the opposite parties, and they had  appeared before this Forum, but not filed version.  Considering their absence, they were set exparte by this Forum.

            3. Considering the allegations of the complainant, this Forum has  raised the following issues:-

            1) Whether there is any deficiently in service and negligence on the part of the

                opposite parties in repayment of fixed deposit to the complainant?

           

2) Whether the complainant is entitled to get compensation and costs from the

               opposite parties?

          

            5. Issues 1 and 2:- Complainant had filed proof affidavit in the support of his case and produced documents in evidence – Ext.A1 marked. Ext. A1 is the copy of   Pass book  issued by the opposite parties to the complainant at the time of depositing the amount   It shows the deposited amount, interest not paid.  The book shows that an amount of Rs.6,00,000/-  (Rupees six lakhs only) is the balance outstanding amount to be released.   

6. On a careful study of the entire matter of this case, it can be seen that as per the assurance given by the opposite parties, the complainant had deposited the amount in the Trust administered by the opposite parties. The opposite parties had not                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             paid interest to the complainant  for the said deposited amount.  Since the opposite parties had defaulted payment of interest, the complainant requested the opposite parties to return the amount with interest. But the opposite parties have not shown any  effort to return the same. This will amounts to cheating. The entire actions on the part of the opposite parties shows the deficiency in service and negligence. There is no justification on the part of the opposite parties in retaining the amount which is payable to the complainant. The complainant is entitled to get back the deposited amounts with interest fully. Since there is deficiency in service and negligence on the part of the opposite parties by way denial of repayment to the depositors, the complainant is entitled to get compensation and costs from the opposite parties and that the opposite parties are jointly and severely liable for that.  Considering, the whole aspects of this case, we are fully convinced that the allegations put forward by the complainant are highly genuine. So the complaint is to be allowed – All the issues are found in favour of the complainant.

            In the result, for the ends of justice, we hereby direct the opposite parties to return the amount of Rs. 6,00,000/- (Rupees six lakhs only) with 18% interest from 17.07.2006 till the date of payment to the complainant  and pay a compensation of Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees five thousand only) to the complainant for his mental agony, pain, sufferings, inconvenience and loss due to the grossest deficiency in service and culpable negligence on the part of the opposite parties by way of refusal to return back the deposited amounts and its interest in time to the complainant, and further pay a sum of Rs. 2,000/- (Rupees Two thousand only) as cost of this proceedings. We further direct the opposite parties to pay the above said amounts to the complainant within the 30 days from the date of receipt of this order.

            Pronounced in open Forum on this the 30th day of  November, 2010.

   

 

                                                                                                 Sd/- Smt. N. Shajitha Beevi:

 

                                                                                                 Sd/- Sri. Jimmy Korah:

                                                           

                                                                                                 Sd/- Sri.K. Anidudhan:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Appendix:-

 

Evidence of the complainant:- 

 

Ext. A1                        -                       Copy of the  Pass Book

 

  Evidence of the opposite parties:- Nil

 

// True Copy //

 

                                                                                                                        By Order

 

 

                                                                                                            Senior Superintendent

To

            Complainant/Opposite parties/S.F.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Typed by:- pr/- 

Compared by:-         

 

  

 

 

 
 
[HONORABLE JIMMY KORAH]
PRESIDENT
 
[HONORABLE K.Anirudhan]
Member

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.