Kerala

Kottayam

CC/187/2011

Kuruvila Baby - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Secretary KSEB - Opp.Party(s)

16 Dec 2011

ORDER

Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum
Civil Station,Kottayam
Kerala
 
CC NO. 187 Of 2011
 
1. Kuruvila Baby
Illichiraveedu,Aarppukara,P.OVilloothy
Kottayam
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Secretary KSEB
Vydyuthibhavan,Pattam
TVM
2. The Ex.Engineer
KSEB Electrical Section,Gandhi Nagar Medicall College
3. The Ex.Engineer
KSEB Electrical Section,Gandhi Nagar Medicall College
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONORABLE Santhosh Kesava Nath P PRESIDENT
 HONORABLE K.N Radhakrishnan Member
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

 

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KOTTAYAM.
Present
Sri. Santhosh Kesavanath P. President
                                                                                                                                      Sri.K.N. Radhakrishnan, Member       
 
CC No.187/11
Friday the 16th day of December, 2011
 
Petitioner                                              :   Kuruvila Baby,
                                                                  Illichira Veedu,
                                                                Villoonni PO,
                                                                Arpookkara.
                                                       Vs.
Opposite party                                     : The Secretary,
                                                              K.S.E.B, Thiruvananthapuram.
                                                            2) The Executive Engineer,
                                                                 K.S.E.B, Gandhi Nagar Section.
                                                            3) The Asst.Exe.Engineer,
                                                                 K.S.E.B., Gandhi Nagar Section                 
 
O R D E R
 
Sri. Santhosh Kesavanath P. President
 
            Petitioner present. Opposite party represented. Head both sides. In the version, opposite party admitted that they are ready to issue fresh bill as per Section 33(2) of condition of supply 2005 for the disputed meter faulty period.
            So, impugned bill dated 7/11 is cancelled. Opposite party is directed to issue fresh bill in accordance with law. Opposite party is directed to adjust the amount which was already remitted by the petitioner in the fresh bill. Excess amount if any collected is to be adjusted in future bill. Petition disposed accordingly with aforesaid direction.
 
Sri. Santhosh Kesavanath P. President              Sd/-    
 
Sri.K.N. Radhakrishnan, Member                                 Sd/-                
 
 
By Order,
 
 

Senior Superintendent

 
 
[HONORABLE Santhosh Kesava Nath P]
PRESIDENT
 
[HONORABLE K.N Radhakrishnan]
Member

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.