Kerala

Kannur

CC/10/60

PK Abdul Khader, - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Secretary, Koyyod SC Bank - Opp.Party(s)

31 May 2010

ORDER


In The Consumer Disputes Redressal ForumKannur
CONSUMER CASE NO. 10 of 60
1. PK Abdul Khader, Kunhivalappil House, Koyyod, PO Koyyod,Kannur DtKannurKerala ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. The Secretary, Koyyod SC BankPO Koyyod, Kannur DtKannurKerala2. The Managing Director,Kerala State Co op Consumer Federation, Gandhinagar, KochiErnakulamKerala3. The Manager, K;oldy Petrolium India LtdMoongilamada ,Vannamada,PalakkadPalakkadKerala ...........Respondent(s)


For the Appellant :
For the Respondent :

Dated : 31 May 2010
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KANNUR

 

Present: Sri.K.Gopalan:  President

Smt.K.P.Prethakumari:  Member

Smt.M.D.Jessy:               Member

 

                                                  Dated this, the   31st day of May    2010

 

C.C.No.60/2010

 

P.K.Abdulkhader,

Kunhivalappil House,

Koyyod, P.O.Koyyod                                                                   Complainant

 

 

1. Secretary,

    Koyyod Service co.op.Bank,

    P.O.Koyyod

2. Managing Director,

    Kerala State Co.op.Consumer Federation,               opposite parties

    Gandhi Nagar, Kochi.

3. Koldy Petroleum India Ltd.

   Moongilamada,

   Vannamada, Kozhinhampara, Palakkad.

 

 

          O R D E R

 

Smt.M.D.Jessy, Member

            This is a complaint filed under section12 of the consumer protection Act for getting an order directing the opposite parties to refund Rs.5750/- with interest and cost

The case of the complainant in brief is as follows:           The opposite parties jointly provided gas connection for domestic purpose. The opposite parties offered spot connection and regular supply of gas cylinders without any delay. When complainant approached the 1st opposite party he assured that 2nd opposite party will provide gas connection on deposit of Rs.5750/- that will be refunded in the event of termination of the gas connection. Complainant paid Rs.5750/- and availed gas connection. But later on the supply of gas happened to be irregular as against the assurance of 1st opposite party. More over they supplied refilled gas cylinders that of substandard quality and quantity. Hence the complainant cancelled the gas connection and asked for refund of the amount. 1st opposite party was not ready to refund the amount and hence the complaint.

            On receiving the complaint, notices were issued to the opposite parties. Opposite parties 2 and 3 filed their version.

 2nd opposite party filed their version  contending that at the time of giving cooking gas connection consumer fed had received Rs.5750/- from all the consumers including the complainant in this OP. Out of this amount Rs.5500/- was given to Koldy Petroleum India Ltd. And Rs.100/- to primary societies through which connection was availed and consumfefed itself appropriated Rs.150/-. As per the agreement   with the Koldy Petroleum India Ltd. They supplied two cylinders and one regulator to each consumer. The fled cylinders in a periodical manner were also supplied by Koldy Petroleum India Ltd.

            3rd opposite party filed their version contending that as per agreement between the 3rd opposite party  and Kerala State  Consumer Federation Ltd. Kochin who is entrusted with the supply of LPG  connection through Neethi stores or  any retail sales outlets of the Kerala State consumer federation L:td.,3rd opposite party has performed their part without any default.

On the above pleadings the following issues were raised for consideration.

1. Whether there is any deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties?

2. Whether the complainant is entitled for remedy as prayed in the complaint?

3. Relief and cost.

            The evidence consists of proof affidavit of complainant and Ext.A1 marked.

 Issue Nos. 1 to 3

            The complainant has stated in the complaint that she has availed gas connection from 1st opposite party by paying an amount of Rs.5750/-. The complainant was assured that the amount will be refunded at the time when the equipments are surrendered..  Ext.A1 is the receipt, which shows that the complainant has paid Rs.5750/-  to 1st    opposite party. Unchallenged evidence adduced by the complainant by chief affidavit proves the case of the complainant that the distribution of cooking gas had been irregular and thereby the complainant and family suffered much difficulties. There is deficiency in service on the part of opposite parties. Hence all the opposite parties are jointly and severally liable to refund Rs.5750/- to the complainant. Thus issues 1 to 3 are found in favour of the complainant.

                        In the result, complaint is allowed directing the opposite parties to refund Rs.5750/-(Rupees Five thousand Seven hundred and fifty only) to the complainant within one month from the date of receipt of this order, failing which the complainant is allowed to execute the order against the opposite parties under the provisions of consumer protection Act.

                                               

                   Sd/-President                          Sd/- Member                   Sd/- Member

 

                                                  APPENDIX

Exhibits for the complainant

 A1Receipt issued by OP                                 

Exhibits for the opposite parties: Nil                 

Witness examined for either side                                               /forwarded by order/

 

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 Senior Superintendent

 


HONORABLE PREETHAKUMARI.K.P, MemberHONABLE MR. GOPALAN.K, PRESIDENTHONORABLE JESSY.M.D, Member