Kerala

Kannur

CC/10/184

MV Jameela, - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Secretary, Kappad Service Co-op Bank Ltd, - Opp.Party(s)

20 Nov 2010

ORDER


CDRF,KannurCDRF,Kannur
Complaint Case No. CC/10/184
1. MV Jameela, Fathima Manzil, Vattappoil, PO Eachoor, Kannur Kerala ...........Appellant(s)

Versus.
1. The Secretary, Kappad Service Co-op Bank Ltd, PO KappadKannur Kerala2. The Managing Director, Kerala State Co-op Concumer Federation, Gandhinagar, Ernakulam,Kerala3. The Manager, Koly Petrolium India, Moongilamada, Vannamada, Palakkad,Kerala ...........Respondent(s)



BEFORE:
HONORABLE MR. GOPALAN.K ,PRESIDENTHONORABLE PREETHAKUMARI.K.P ,MemberHONORABLE JESSY.M.D ,Member
PRESENT :

Dated : 20 Nov 2010
JUDGEMENT

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

DOF. 27.7.2010

DOO.20.11. 2010

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KANNUR

 

Present: Sri.K.Gopalan:  President

Smt.K.P.Preethakumari:  Member

Smt.M.D.Jessy:               Member

 

Dated this, the 20th day of November   2010

 

C.C.No.184/2010

M.V.Jameela,

Fathima Manzil,

Vattappoyil, P.O.Varam                               Complainant                                                                             

 

 

1. Secretary,

     Kappad Service co.op.Bank,

    P.O.Kappad.

2. Managing Director,

    Kerala State Co.op.Consumer Federation,    Opposite parties                                                                       

    Gandhi Nagar, Kochi.

3. Koldy Petroleum India Ltd.

   Moongilamada,

   Vannamada, Kozhinhampara, Palakkad.

 

 

          O R D E R

 

Smt.M.D.Jessy, Member

          This is a complaint filed under section12 of the consumer protection Act for getting an order directing the opposite parties to refund `5750 with interest and cost

The case of the complainant in brief is as follows: The opposite parties jointly provided gas connection for domestic purpose. The opposite parties offered spot connection and regular supply of gas cylinders without any delay. When complainant approached the 1st opposite party he assured that 2nd opposite party will provide gas connection on deposit of  `5750 that will be refunded in the event of termination of the gas connection. Complainant paid `5750 and availed gas connection. But later on the supply of gas happened to be irregular as against the assurance of 1st opposite party. More over they supplied refilled gas cylinders were of substandard quality and quantity. Hence the complainant cancelled the gas connection and asked for refund of the amount. 1st opposite party was not ready to refund the amount and hence the complaint.

          On receiving the complaint, Forum sent notices to opposite parties.  2nd opposite party appeared and filed their version.

2nd opposite party filed version  contending that at the time of giving cooking gas connection consumer fed had received `5750 from all the consumers including the complainant in this OP. Out of this amount `5500 was given to Koldy Petroleum India Ltd. And `100/- to primary societies through which connection was availed and consumerfed itself appropriated `150. As per the agreement  with the Koldy Petroleum India Ltd. they supplied two cylinders and one regulator to each consumer. The filled cylinders in a periodical manner were also supplied by Koldy Petroleum India Ltd.

On the above pleadings the following issues were raised for consideration.

1.Whether there is any deficiency in service on the part of opposite

    parties?

2. Whether the complainant is entitled for remedy as prayed in the

    complaint?

3. Relief and cost.

                    The evidence consists of proof affidavit of the complainant and Exts.A1 and A2 marked.

Issue Nos. 1 to 3

          The complainant has stated in the complaint that he has availed gas connection from 1st opposite party by paying an amount of `5750. The complainant was assured that the amount will be refunded at the time when the equipments are surrendered. Ext.A1 is the receipt dated 13.7.2010 which shows complainant already paid `5750 to 1st opposite party on 24.9.98.  1st opposite party has admitted that they have received `5750 at the time of giving connection. It is understandable that if there is no supply of gas that creates much trouble to consumers of gas when it was complained to 1st opposite party his explanation was that 2nd and 3rd opposite parties are responsible for those troubles. Ext.A2 is the surrendering certificate dt.13.7.2010 which shows the complainant has surrendered two cylinders and one regulator to 1st opposite party. Hence all opposite parties are jointly and severally liable to refund ` 5750 to the complainant. Thus issue No. 1 to 3 is found in favour of complainant.

          In the light of the available evidence on record we are of opinion that thee is deficiency in service on the part of opposite parties. Thus opposite parties are liable to refund the amount of `5750 to complainant

                   In the result, complaint is allowed directing the opposite parties to refund `5750(Rupees Five thousand Seven hundred and fifty only) to the complainant within one month from the date of receipt of this order, failing which the complainant is allowed to execute the order against the opposite parties under the provisions of consumer protection Act.

                                      Sd/-                   Sd/-                            Sd/-

                             President                Member                    Member

 

                                                  APPENDIX

Exhibits for the complainant

A1  & A2. Certificate issued by OP

Exhibits for the opposite parties: Nil

Witness examined for either side: Nil

 

                                                                         /forwarded by order/

 

 

                                                                           Senior Superintendent

Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kannur  

 


[HONORABLE PREETHAKUMARI.K.P] Member[HONORABLE MR. GOPALAN.K] PRESIDENT[HONORABLE JESSY.M.D] Member