Kerala

Kannur

CC/281/2011

C Sainaba, - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Secretary, Kappad SC Bank, - Opp.Party(s)

13 Dec 2011

ORDER

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KANNUR
 
CC NO. 281 Of 2011
 
1. C Sainaba,
Shareefa Manzil,Chelora, Kappad 670006
Kannur
Kerala
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Secretary, Kappad SC Bank,
PO Kappad, 670006
Kannur
Kerala
2. The Manging Direcotr,
Kerala State Co operative Consumer Federarion, Ganhi Nagar Kochi 20
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONORABLE MR. GOPALAN.K PRESIDENT
 HONORABLE PREETHAKUMARI.K.P Member
 HONORABLE JESSY.M.D Member
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

D.O.F. 13.09.2011

                                          D.O.O. 13.12.2011

 

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KANNUR

 

Present:      Sri. K.Gopalan                  :                President

                   Smt. K.P.Preethakumari   :               Member

                   Smt. M.D.Jessy                 :               Member

 

Dated this the 13th day of December,  2011.

 

C.C.No.281/2011

 

C. Sainaba ,

Shareefa Manzil,                                        :         Complainant

Chelora,

P.O. Kappad, Kannur - 6

 

1.  The Secretary,

     Kappad Service Co-op. Bank

     P.O. Kappad, Kannur Dist.

2.  The Managing Director,               :         :         Opposite parties

     Kerala State Co-op. Consumer

     Federation Ltd., Gandhi Nagar                      

     Ernakulam,  Cochin – 682 020

 

O R D E R

 

Smt. M.D. Jessy, Member

          This is a complaint filed under Section 12 of Consumer Protection

 Act for getting an order directing the opposite parties to refund ` 5750 with interest and cost.  

          The case of the complainant in brief is as follows :  Complainant has taken cooking gas from opposite party. The opposite parties  provided gas connection for domestic purposes.  The opposite party offered spot connection and regular supply of gas cylinders without any delay.  But there was no regular supply of cooking gas and committed gross defect in performing the terms of the contract.  The said payment was made through agent of opposite party ie Kappad Service Co-op. Bank Ltd, P.O. Kappad.  But the supply of gas happened to be irregular.  So complainant cancelled gas connection and made request to repay deposit amount before Secretary, Kappad Service Co-op. Bank.  But the opposite party were not ready to repay the amount.    Hence the complainant cancelled the gas connection and asked for refund of the amount and opposite party was not ready to refund the amount and hence the complaint.

On receiving the complaint notices were issued to opposite parties.

2nd opposite party filed their version contending that at the time of giving cooking gas connection Consumerfed had received ` 5750 from all the consumers including the complainant in this O.P.  Out of this amount     ` 5500 was given to Koldy Petroleum India Ltd and ` 100 to primary societies through which connection was availed and Consumerfed itself appropriated ` 150.  As per the agreement with the Koldy Petroleum India Ltd., they supplied two cylinders and one regulator to each consumers.  The filled cylinders in a periodical manner were also supplied by Koldy Petroleum India Ltd.    

          On the above pleadings the following issues were raised for consideration.

1.        Whether there is any deficiency of service on the part of the opposite parties?

2.        Whether the complainant is entitled for remedy as prayed in the complaint?

3.        Relief and cost?

The evidence consists of oral testimony of the complainant and Ext.A1 and A2 marked.

Issue No.1 to 3 :

          The complainant has stated in the complaint that he has availed gas connection from 1st opposite party by paying an amount of ` 5750 to 1st opposite party.    Eventhough they promised to distribute the gas regularly, they distributed low quality with heavy price to the complainant. So complainant decided to surrender gas cylinder and regulator to opposite party.  The complainant was assured that the amount will be refunded at the time when the equipments are surrendered.  Ext.A1 is the receipt dated 03.09.2011 which shows the complainant had paid the amount to opposite party.  Ext.A2 is the surrendering certificate dated 03.09.11 which shows the complainant had surrendered two cylinders and one regulator to 1st opposite party.  Under such circumstances that opposite parties are liable to refund the amount of ` 5750.  Hence the issues 1 to 3 are found in favour of the complainant.

          In the result, the complaint is allowed directing the opposite parties to refund ` 5750 (Rupees Five Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty only) to the complainant within one month from the date of receipt of this order, failing which the complainant is entitled to execute the order as per the provisions of Consumer Protection Act.

                              Sd/-                      Sd/-

                              

                        President                   Member     

 

 

APPENDIX

 

Exhibits for the Complainant

 

A1.  Receipt Certificate dated 03.09.11 issued by 1st OP.

A2.  Certificate dated 03.09.2011 issued by 1st OP.

 

Exhibits for the opposite party

 

Nil

 

Witness examined for the complainant

 

PW1.  Complainant

 

Witness examined for opposite party

 

Nil

 

 

 

 

                                                                          /forwarded by order/

 

 

 

                                                                     SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT

 

 
 
[HONORABLE MR. GOPALAN.K]
PRESIDENT
 
[HONORABLE PREETHAKUMARI.K.P]
Member
 
[HONORABLE JESSY.M.D]
Member

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.