Kerala

Kasaragod

CC/10/170

K.A.Joseph - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Secretary, Hosdurg Housing Co-operative Society Ltd - Opp.Party(s)

18 Oct 2010

ORDER


C.D.R.F, KasargodDISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, OLD SP OFFICE BUILDING, PULIKUNNU, KASARAGOD
CONSUMER CASE NO. 10 of 170
1. K.A.JosephS/o.Augustine, Kumaraapattu House, Po. Dharkkas, Maloth Village, Hosdurg TalukKasaragodKerala ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. The Secretary, Hosdurg Housing Co-operative Society LtdPo.KanhnagdKasaragodKerala ...........Respondent(s)


For the Appellant :
For the Respondent :

Dated : 18 Oct 2010
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

                                                                            Date of filing  : 02-08-2010 

                                                                            Date of order  : 18-10-2010

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KASARAGOD

                                                C.C. 170/2010

                         Dated this, the  18th  day of  October    2010

PRESENT

SRI.K.T.SIDHIQ                                            : PRESIDENT

SMT.P.RAMADEVI                                       : MEMBER

 

K.A.Joseph,

S/o.Augustine,

Kumarapattu House,

Po.Dharkkas, Maloth Village,                                               } Complainant

Hosdurg Taluk,

Kasaragod Dist.

(Adv. E.Sukumaran, Hosdurg)

 

The Secretary,

Hosdurg Housing Co-operative Society Ltd,                } Opposite party

Hosdurg, Po.Kanhangad.

 

                                                                        O R D E R

 

            Complainant absent.  No representation. Inspite of repeated chances availed by complainant.  It appears that complainant is not interested to prosecute the matter.  Hence name of complainant called absent.  Complaint dismissed for default.

    Sd/-                                                                                                     Sd/-

MEMBER                                                                                                   PRESIDENT

Pj/                                                                                Forwarded by Order

 

                                                                            SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT

 

 

 


, , ,