West Bengal

Kolkata-II(Central)

CC/213/2020

Shyamal Dutta - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Scretary, Humara India Credit Co Operative Society Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

Janapriya Banerjee

21 Jun 2022

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
KOLKATA UNIT - II (CENTRAL)
8-B, NELLIE SENGUPTA SARANI, 7TH FLOOR,
KOLKATA-700087.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/213/2020
( Date of Filing : 13 Oct 2020 )
 
1. Shyamal Dutta
377, VIP Nagar, 3rd Floor, Kolkata-700100, P.S. Anandapur.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Scretary, Humara India Credit Co Operative Society Ltd.
Mangal Jyoti, 227/2, A.J.C.Bose Road, Kolkata-700020.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Swapan Kumar Mahanty PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Sahana Ahmed Basu MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. Ashoke Kumar Ganguly MEMBER
 
PRESENT:Janapriya Banerjee, Advocate for the Complainant 1
 
Dated : 21 Jun 2022
Final Order / Judgement

FINAL ORDER/JUDGEMENT           

SHRI SWAPAN KUMAR MAHANTY,   PRESIDENT

 

 

The facts, as stated in the complaint and emerged from the documents attached with it,  are that  Humara India Credit Cooperative Society Ltd. is a Financial Institution. OP  is the secretarty of Humara India Credit Cooperative Society Ltd.  Complainant invested  Rs. 23,932/-  to the OP  on 30.06.2016  for  a period of 36 months.  OP issued  certificate beairng No. 605001601024 to the complainant. The maturity date of the said  certificates is 30.06.2019  and its maturity value is Rs. 36,760/-. Despite repeated request the OP did not refund the matured amount. Notice dated 05.10.2020 was issued to the OP but no fruitful result is forthcoming.  Complainant further alleges that there is gross deficiency in service and unfair trade practice on the part of the  OP.

In view of the gross deficiency in service and unfair trade practices of the OP,  complainant has filed  the instant  consumer complaint seeking payment of matured amount along with compensation and litigation cost.

            The OP contested the case by filing WV denying the allegations of the complainant. The OP has admitted the investment of the complainant but alleges that the complainant failed to submit KYC documents to the OP for payment of matured amount. There is no defieicny of service and unfair trade practice on the part of the OP.

Complainant has filed his evidence supporting the allegations made in the complaint petition. Complainant has also filed various documents in support of her case. Despite given opportunities the OP failed to file their E/chief.

            We have considered the argument of the Ld. Advocate for the complainant and examined the record.

            It is not in dispute that the complainant invested Rs. 23,932/- to the OP on  30.06.2016 and its maturity date is 30.06.2019. Despite several request and notice dated 05.10.2020 OP did not pay the matured amount to the complainant. OP is fully aware that they are liable to pay the matured amount to the complainant on its maturity. Complainant invested his hard earned money with the OP. The OP is deliberate to make illegal gains and to deprive the complainant from his lawful right. In fact, the OP withhold the maturity amount which no doubt deceitful manner of trade.

OP has not filed their E/chief denying the allegations made in the complaint petition. Complainant in his  affidavit did support the allegations made out in the complaint. Therefore, it cannot be said that complainant has failed to prove deficiency in service and unfair trade practice of the OP. The act of the OP is a clear case of deception, which resulted in the injury and loss of opportunity to the complainant. Had the complainant not invested his  money to the OP, he would have invested the same elsewhere. Complainant cannot be wait indefinitely to get the matured amount. Complainant has suffered mental agony and harassment. It is settled principal of law that the compensation should be commensurate with loss of suffered and it should be just, fair and reasonable and not arbitrary. To get relief, complainant has to wage a long drawn and tedious legal battle. In these circumstances, the complainant is entitled to get the maturity amount of Humara India Credit Cooperative Society Ltd. along with compensation and litigation cost.

Based on the discussion above, the Consumer Case is allowed  in  part on contest against the OP with the following directions :-

  1. OP is directed to pay matured amount of Rs. 36,760/- (Rupees thirty six thousnad seven hundred sixty) only to the complainant.
  2. OP is further directed to pay Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten  thousand) only as compensation to the complainant on account of mental agony and physical harassment.
  3. OP is also directed to pay Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees five thousand) only towards litigation cost to the complainant.

The above directions be complied by the OP within a period of 90 days from today. For failure or omission in compliance within the stipulated period, the complainant shall be at liberty to put the order in execution as per CP Act.

Copy of the judgment be supplied to the parties free of cost as per CP Act. Upload the judgment on the website of this Commission for perusal of the parties.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Swapan Kumar Mahanty]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Sahana Ahmed Basu]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Ashoke Kumar Ganguly]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.