Kerala

Ernakulam

CC/13/819

C.V.THOMAS - Complainant(s)

Versus

THE SALES MANAGER, SONY INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED. - Opp.Party(s)

I T GEORGE

11 Feb 2014

ORDER

BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
ERNAKULAM
 
Complaint Case No. CC/13/819
 
1. C.V.THOMAS
S/O.VARKEY, KOTTISSERYKUDIYIL HOUSE, KOTHAMANGALAM.P.O, ERNAKULAM-686691
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. THE SALES MANAGER, SONY INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED.
2nd FLOOR, MUSCAT TOWER, S.A.ROAD, KADAVANTHRA, COCHIN-682020
2. ALIF COMMUNICATION
PENTA MENAKA, SHOP No.B1, SHANMUGHAM ROAD, ERNAKULAM-681031
3. ACCEL FRONTLINE LTD
22/2207, OPPO.VEEKSHANAM PRESS, VEEKSHNAM ROAD, COCHIN-682018
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONORABLE MR. A.RAJESH PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. SHEEN JOSE MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. V.K BEENAKUMARI MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
ORDER

BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, ERNAKULAM.

Date of filing : 27/11/2013

Date of Order : 11/02/2014

 

Present :-

Shri. A. Rajesh, President.

Smt. V.K. Beena Kumari, Member.

 

C.C. No. 819/2013

Between

     

    C.V. Thomas, S/o. Varkey,

    ::

    Complainant

    Kottisserykudiyil House, Kothamangalam.P.O.,

    Ernakulam – 686 691.

     

    (By Adv. I.T. George,

    Ishnasseril, Panangad. P.O., Ernakulam – 682 506.)

    And

     

    1. The Sales Manager,

    Sony India Pvt. Ltd.,

    ::

    Opposite Parties

    2nd Floor, Muscat Tower, S.A. Road,

    Kadavanthra, Cochin – 682 020.

    2. Alif Communication,

    Penta Menaka, Shop No. B1,

    Shanmugham Road,

    Ernakulam – 681 031.

    3. Accel Frontline Ltd.,

    22/2207, Opp. Veekshanam

    Press, Veekshanam Road,

    Cochin – 682 018.

     

    (Parties-in-person)

    O R D E R

    A. Rajesh, President.

     

    Complainant present. Opposite parties represented. The representative of the opposite parties submitted that they are prepared to refund the price of the mobile handset to the complainant. The suggestion on the part of the opposite parties is found genuine and reasonable. Accordingly, the opposite parties are directed to refund Rs. 23,809.50 to the complainant within 30 days from today. The complainant is directed to return the accessories of the mobile handset to the opposite parties simultaneously. If the opposite parties fail to pay the amount in time, the above amount would carry interest @ 12% p.a. from today till payment. Resultantly, the proceedings in this complaint stands closed.

     

    Pronounced in the open Forum on this the 11th day of February 2014.

    Forwarded/By Order, Sd/- A. Rajesh, President.

    Sd/- V.K. Beena Kumari, Member.

     

     

    Senior Superintendent.

     
     
    [HONORABLE MR. A.RAJESH]
    PRESIDENT
     
    [HON'BLE MR. SHEEN JOSE]
    MEMBER
     
    [HON'BLE MRS. V.K BEENAKUMARI]
    MEMBER

    Consumer Court Lawyer

    Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

    Bhanu Pratap

    Featured Recomended
    Highly recommended!
    5.0 (615)

    Bhanu Pratap

    Featured Recomended
    Highly recommended!

    Experties

    Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

    Phone Number

    7982270319

    Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.