Haryana

Karnal

CC/12/2021

Maya Devi - Complainant(s)

Versus

The S.D.O. UHBVNL - Opp.Party(s)

Manoj Dhakwala

14 Aug 2024

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL.

                                                          Complaint.No.12 of 2021

                                                          Date of instt.07.01.2021

                                                          Date of Decision:14.08.2024

 

Maya Devi wife of Hira Lal, resident of House No.21, gali no.19, near Heritage Lawn, Vikas Colony, Karnal.

 

          ...…Complainant.

                                        Versus

The SDO UHBVNL (OP) Sub Urban Sub Division Karnal.

                        ....Opposite party.

  Complaint under Section 35 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

Before    Sh. Jaswant Singh………President. 

                Mrs. Sarvjeet Kaur…………Member

 

                               

Present:   None for the Complainant.

                Shri Virender Sachdeva, Counsel for the OP.

                                                         

               Today the case is fixed for arguments on behalf of the complainant. None has put into appearance on behalf of the complainant. Position remained the same on the adjourned date. Case called several times since morning but none has put into appearance on behalf of the complainant. It is already 03:30 PM. No further wait is justified.

                In the present complaint, OP argued its case on 27.02.2024 and thereafter case was repeatedly adjourned for arguments on behalf of the complainant but till today complainant has failed argue the case. It appears that the complainant is no more interested to pursue the present complaint. The present complaint pertains to the year 2021. Further adjournment for the same purpose would not be justified as it would amount to wastage of precious time of this Commission and would cause to harass the OP.

                   Hence, in view the above facts, the present complaint is hereby dismissed. However, complainant is at liberty to file fresh complaint on the same cause of action, if so desired. Parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and file be consigned to the record room.

Dated:14.08.2024.            

                    President,

District Consumer Disputes

Redressal Commission, Karnal.

                (Saravjeet Kaur) 

                      Member