Orissa

Baleshwar

CC/29/2014

Sri Sudhir See, aged about 64 years - Complainant(s)

Versus

The S.D.O, Electrical, NESCO, Jaleswar - Opp.Party(s)

Sj. Sitansu Nandy & Others

01 Aug 2023

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BALASORE
AT- KATCHERY HATA, NEAR COLLECTORATE, P.O, DIST- BALASORE-756001
 
Complaint Case No. CC/29/2014
( Date of Filing : 25 Feb 2014 )
 
1. Sri Sudhir See, aged about 64 years
S/o. Late Satrughna See, At- Nahanjara, P.O- Alalpur, P.S- Jaleswar, Dist- Balasore.
Odisha
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The S.D.O, Electrical, NESCO, Jaleswar
At/P.O/P.S- Jaleswar, Dist- Balasore.
Odisha
2. The J.E, Electrical (NESCO), Jaleswar
At/P.O/P.S- Jaleswar, Dist- Balasore.
Odisha
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. NILAKANTHA PANDA PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. JIBAN KRUSHNA BEHERA MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 Sri Yudhisthira Nayak, Advocate for the Opp. Party 0
 Sri Yudhisthira Nayak, Advocate for the Opp. Party 0
Dated : 01 Aug 2023
Final Order / Judgement

                                         The case record is posted today for payment of cost by Complainant & hearing of the case. Neither the complainant nor his Advocate is present. The Advocate for Ops is present and files a memo to dismiss the case on the reason mentioned therein. On repeated calls, none respond on behalf of the complainant. Hence, hearing of the case could not be taken up.   

                                         In the present case, the Ops were appeared and filed their written version. Advocate for the Ops files a memo that the problem of the complainant was solved and he was absent since long and also not paid the cost of Rs.200/-. As it appears from the case record, the complainant did not turn up and slept over the matter since 01.05.2019 and no step is taken nor did his advocate take any step on his behalf, for which hearing of the case impaired and further the valuable time of this Commission is being wasted. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case and the nature and conduct of the complainant, this Commission is of the view that the complaint of the complainant should be dismissed.   

                                         Accordingly, the complaint of the complainant is dismissed for non-prosecution of the case. The interim order, if any, passed against the Ops is treated to be infructuous.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. NILAKANTHA PANDA]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JIBAN KRUSHNA BEHERA]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.