Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

A/105/2023

Mythili, W/o Theerthalingam - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Chengalpattu Revenue District & Anr. - Opp.Party(s)

B. Sudhakar

27 Mar 2023

ORDER

IN THE TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE         Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R. SUBBIAH                        -  PRESIDENT

                         Thiru. R VENKATESAPERUMAL                            -  MEMBER

 

F.A. No.105/2023

(Against the Order dt.25.11.2022 in  Sr. No.29/2021 on the file of

D.C.D.R.C., Chengalpattu)

DATEDTHE 27^TH DAY MARCH 2023

 

Mrs. Mythili,

W/o. Mr. Theerthalingam,

No.1, Pazhandi Amman Koil Street,

Mettu Thandalam,

Thiruporur Taluk,

Chengalpattu District.                                                            .. Appellant / Complainant.

-Versus-

1. The Revenue Divisional Officer,

Chengalpattu Revenue District,

Chengalpattu,

Chengalpattu District.   

 

2. The District Collector,

Chengalpattu District.                                                  .. Respondents / Opposite parties.

. 

Counsel for Appellant / Complainant              : M/s. B. Sudhakar

 

              This appeal has been filed by the  Appellant / Complainant to set aside the order dt.25.11.2022 passed in SR. No.29/2021 and this Commission made the following:-

ORDER

HON’BLE THIRU.  JUSTICE R. SUBBIAH, PRESIDENT.  ( Open Court).

 

This Appeal is filed, seeking to set aside the Order, dated 25.11.2022, passed by the DCDRC, Chengalpattu, in S.R. No.29 of 2021 rejecting the complaint, filed by the appellant herein on the ground “Prima facie case not made out” at the SR Stage.

   2. Heard the appellant.

   3. In our view, rejecting the SR without even assigning any reason there-for is not a proper course.   A cryptic and non-speaking order that has no basis to infer due application of mind to the matter by the Forum concerned, is not only bad in law but also against the principles of natural justice.

          4. In the result, this appeal is allowed and the impugned order dated 25.11.2022 passed by the DCDRC, Kanchipuram @ Chengalpattu in SR No.29 of 2021 is set aside and the matter is remitted back to the District Commission, Chengalpattu with a direction to pass a detailed speaking order in accordance with law.

 

 

                    -Sd-                                                                                                             -Sd-   

R.VENKATESAPERUMAL                                                                      R.SUBBIAH                        

          MEMBER                                                                                           PRESIDENT

 

 

KIR/TNSCDRC/Chennai/Orders/March/2023.