For the DHR: Self.

For the JDR No.1: Mr. Surya narayan Mohapatra, Advocate.

For the JDR No. 2 ,3 & 4: Mr. Krishna Prasad Patnaik, Advocate.

                                                            DATE OF FILING: 17.9.2013.

                                                            DATE OF DISPOSAL: 1.6.2016.

EXTRACT COPY OF ORDER DATED 1.6.2016.

            The DHR is present and filed an application praying to add a party to JDR No.5. Copy not served to the other sides. The Advocate for JDR No.1 is present filed a copy of claim status Query Member wise  report and a memo stating that he has complied the orders passed on dated 20.1.2016 and paid P.F. dues. The Advocate for JDRS 2 to 4 is present and filed a memo stating that the DHR has already received all financial benefits. The said memo endorsed with remarks refused to receive by the DHR.

            Heard at length from the both sides. The application for adding JDR No.5 is not entertainable, since at the execution stage as there is no provision for adding new party, the application of the DHR does not carry merits, hence rejected.

            At the time of hearing, the advocate for JDRs argued that, they have complied the orders passed in C.C.  Hence, the present execution application is dropped.

            Issue copy of orders to the parties free of cost.