Kerala

Idukki

CC/09/18

E.G.Chelladurai - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner - Opp.Party(s)

Babu Paul

30 Mar 2009

ORDER


CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, IDUKKIConsumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Idukki, Kuyilimala, Painavu PO-685603
CONSUMER CASE NO. 09 of 18
1. E.G.ChelladuraiField Officer,Briton Division,Pambanar Estate,Peermade Village,IdukkiIdukkiKerala2. P.P.Gopinathan NairSr.Ass.Factory Officer,Pambanar Estate,Peermade villageIdukkiIdukkiKerala ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. The Regional Provident Fund CommissionerEmployees Provident fund organisation,Sub regional office,Chalakuzhi Building,Kottayam.KottayamKerala ...........Respondent(s)


For the Appellant :
For the Respondent :

Dated : 30 Mar 2009
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

 

BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, IDUKKI

Dated this the 30th day of March, 2009

Present:

SRI.LAIJU RAMAKRISHNAN PRESIDENT

SMT.SHEELA JACOB MEMBER

SMT.BINDU SOMAN MEMBER

C.C No.18/2009

Between

Complainants : 1. E.G.Chelladurai,

Field Officer,

Briton Division, Pambanar Estate,

Pambanar P.O, Idukki District.

2. P.P.Gopinathan Nair,

Sr.Asst.Factory Officer,

Pambanar Estate,

Pambanar P.O, Idukki District.

(Both by Adv: Babu Paul)

And

Opposite Party : The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner,

Employees Providnet Fund Organisation,

Sub Regional Office,

Chalakuzhi Building,

C.M.S College Road, P.B No.36,

Kottayam.

(Party in Person)

O R D E R

SRI.LAIJU RAMAKRISHNAN(PRESIDENT

 

Complainants and opposite party absent. No representation. Opposite party already filed written version. The complainants are continuously absent, not appeared after the order to appear as last chance. It means that the complainants are not needed for continuing the case. Hence the petition is dismissed.


 

Pronounced in the Open Forum on this the 30th day of March, 2009

Sd/-

SRI.LAIJU RAMAKRISHNAN(PRESIDENT)

Sd/-

SMT.SHEELA JACOB(MEMBER)

Sd/-

SMT.BINDU SOMAN(MEMBER)


HONORABLE Sheela Jacob, MemberHONORABLE Laiju Ramakrishnan, PRESIDENTHONORABLE Bindu Soman, Member