Chandigarh

DF-II

CC/345/2012

Prince Sharma - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Employees Provident Fund Organization - Opp.Party(s)

complainant in person

25 Jul 2012

ORDER


CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019
CONSUMER CASE NO. 345 of 2012
1. Prince SharmaResident of H.No. 145, Sector 23A, Chandigarh ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Employees Provident Fund Organization Bhavishya Nidhi Bhawan, Plot No. 222,Sector No. -3, Charkop Market, Kandiwali (west), Maharashtra 4000672. State Bank of IndiaMalad West, Mumbai 3. Intelnet Global Services Pvt. Ltd.C-126, Phase -8, Industrial Area, SAS Nagar, Mohali, Punjab 160071 ...........Respondent(s)


For the Appellant :complainant in person, Advocate for
For the Respondent :

Dated : 25 Jul 2012
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM–II, U.T. CHANDIGARH

 

Consumer Complaint No. 345 of 2012

 

 

Prince Sharma        Vs.     The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner                                         & ors.   

 

PRESENT:

 

Complainant in person.

 

Dated the 25th day of July, 2012

 

ORDER

 

           

            The complainant has made the following statement, recorded separately:-

“Due to technical defect(territorial jurisdiction), I do not press this complaint at this stage. It be dismissed as withdrawn. However, I reserve my right to file a fresh complaint on the same cause of action before the competent authority”

 

            In view of the statement made by the complainant, this complaint is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file a fresh complaint on the same cause of action before the competent authority, as per law.

            Certified copy of this order be communicated to the complainant free of cost. After compliance file be consigned.

 

            Sd/-                                                                 Sd/-

(JASWINDER SINGH SIDHU)                            (LAKSHMAN SHARMA)

                        MEMBER                                              PRESIDEN


MRS. MADHU MUTNEJA, MEMBERHONABLE MR. LAKSHMAN SHARMA, PRESIDENT MR. JASWINDER SINGH SIDHU, MEMBER