West Bengal

Kolkata-II(Central)

CC/382/2022

Aanesha Seikh - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Regional Manager, Indusind Bank - Opp.Party(s)

Kazi Sajjad Alam

09 Nov 2022

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
KOLKATA UNIT - II (CENTRAL)
8-B, NELLIE SENGUPTA SARANI, 7TH FLOOR,
KOLKATA-700087.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/382/2022
( Date of Filing : 20 Oct 2022 )
 
1. Aanesha Seikh
Vill-Radhakantapur,P.O.Balitha,P.S. Kotulpur,Dist-Bankura,Pin-722141 and 6, Taltala bazaar Street,P.O and P.S. Taltala, Kolkata-700014.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Regional Manager, Indusind Bank
Consumer Finance Division, 44, 6th Floor, Saket Towers,P.S. Park Street, Kolkata-700016.
2. The Branch Manager, Indusind Bank, Gourhati Morte Branch
Consumer Finance Division,P.O. and P.S. Arambagh,Dist-Hooghly,Pin-712601.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. Sahana Ahmed Basu PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. Ashoke Kumar Ganguly MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 09 Nov 2022
Final Order / Judgement

Order No.02      Date-09.11.2022

 

Today is fixed for admission hearing of the instant consumer case.

While perusing the complaint petition, it is observed that the complainant Mr. Aanesa Seikh

 son of Kajem Seikh of PS Kotulpur District Bankura presently residing at 6, Taltala Bazar Street, Kolkata-700014 has availed a car loan from the OPs IndusInd Bank, PS-Park Street, Kolkata -700016 for purchasing a commercial vehicle.  As per statement, he has been paying EMI from time to time but due to pandemic situation of covid-19 and lockdown, the complainant was unable to use his vehicle regularly for which he has failed to pay the EMI and a huge amount of arrears has not been paid by him. The OP sanctioned additional loan and against that the EMI stands  revised  to Rs. 35,730/-.  The complainant requested the OPs to reduce the EMI to the tune of Rs.  20,000/- - Rs.  25,000/- per month so that he can be able to pay the amount regularly.

While perusing the prayer portion of the complaint petition, it is observed  that along with other prayers  the complainant is praying for a direction upon the OPs to reduce the EMI from Rs.  Rs. 35,730/- to 20,000/-  so that he can repay the loan regularly. The prayer of the complainant is not  found  proper in law and not within the periphery of  the Consumer Protection Act,  2019. Granting of  the prayer of the complainant to reduce the EMIs is exclusively the right and consideration of the OPs where there is no scope of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission to interfere into the matter.

In view of the above, the prayer of the complainant is not tenable in law and accordingly rejected.   

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Sahana Ahmed Basu]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Ashoke Kumar Ganguly]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.