Kerala

Palakkad

CC/92/2010

Polpully Service Co-operative Bank Ltd, - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Regional Agro Industrial - Opp.Party(s)

30 Jul 2010

ORDER


CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMCivil Station, Palakkad - 678001, Kerala
CC NO. 92 Of 2010
1. Polpully Service Co-operative Bank Ltd,No.F.1198,Polpully,Palakkad-rep by the secretary polpully service co-operative Bank Ltd ...........Appellant(s)

Versus.
1. The Regional Agro IndustrialDevelopment Co-operative Of kerala ltd,Raidco Kerala Ltd,H.O.Kannur-2 Rep by Managing Director,Raidco Kerala Ltd,H.O Kannur-2 ...........Respondent(s)



BEFORE:
HONORABLE Smt.Seena.H ,PRESIDENTHONORABLE Smt.Bhanumathi.A.K ,MemberHONORABLE Smt.Preetha.G.Nair ,Member
PRESENT :

Dated : 30 Jul 2010
JUDGEMENT

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

 

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM PALAKKAD

Dated this the 30th day of July 2010 .


 

Present : Smt. Seena.H, President

: Smt. Preetha.G. Nair, Member

: Smt. Bhanumathi.A.K, Member


 

C.C.No.92/2010


 

Polpully Service Co-operative Bank Ltd

No.F.1198

Polpully

Palakkad

Rep. By the Secretary

Polpully Service Co-operative Bank Ltd - Complainant

(Adv.K.N. Vijayaraghavan)

Vs


 

The Regional Agro Industrial

Development Co-opertive of Kerala Ltd

RAIDCO Kerala Ltd

H.O. Kannur -2.

Rep. By Managing Director

RAIDCO Kerala Ltd

H.O. Kannur -2. - Opposite party


 

O R D E R


 

By Smt. Seena. H, President.


 

Complaint coming up for hearing on admission today, the forum deliver the following.


 

Complainant herein purchased a Combined Harvestor D K C 685 with auto grain ladder from the opposite party by paying an amount of Rs.22,00,000/- (Rs. Twenty two Lakh only) . Along with the same also purchased 4 wheel non tipping trailor for Rs.2,32,875/- (Rupees Two Lakhs thirty two thousand eight hundred and seventy five only). The grievance of the complainant is regarding the defect in the harvester machine purchased by him. Complaint filed seeking an order directing the opposite party to repair or replace the defective machine with a new one together with compensation.


 

Complaint posted for hearing on admission. Heard the complainant.


 

- 2 -


 

On perusal of the complaint, it is seen that the value of the goods purchased is above the monetary jurisdiction of the District Forum. Section 11 of the Consumer Protection Act specifically provides that the District Forum shall have jurisdiction to entertain complaints where the value of the goods or services and the compensation if any claimed does not exceed rupees Twenty lakhs.


 

Since the relief claimed by the complainant is beyond the pecuniary, jurisdiction of the District Forum, without going into the merits of the case, complaint is dismissed with direction to approach appropriate forum for relief


 

Pronounced in the open court on this the 30th day of July 2010.

 

President (SD)


 

Member (SD)

 

Member (SD)

Date of filing: 19/07/2010


[HONORABLE Smt.Bhanumathi.A.K] Member[HONORABLE Smt.Seena.H] PRESIDENT[HONORABLE Smt.Preetha.G.Nair] Member