Tamil Nadu

South Chennai

CC/222/2015

K.Vijaya Kumar - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Propritor, Cell Tech, and others - Opp.Party(s)

Party in Persion

27 Jan 2016

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,
CHENNAI (SOUTH)
 
Complaint Case No. CC/222/2015
 
1. K.Vijaya Kumar
Plot No 56 Nesamani Nagar, Perumbakkam, Chennai 100.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Propritor, Cell Tech, and others
Shop 8 Cision Complex, Montieth Road, Egmore, Chennai-8.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  B.RAMALINGAM., MA., ML., PRESIDENT
  Dr.Paul Rajasekaran.,M.A.,D.MIN,HRDI,AIII,BCS MEMBER
  K.AMALA., M.A., L.L.B., MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
ORDER

                                                                        Date of Filing :   27.04.2015

                                                                        Date of Order :   27.01.2016

 

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL FORUM, CHENNAI(SOUTH)

     2nd Floor, Frazer Bridge Road, V.O.C.Nagar, Park Town, Chennai-3

 

PRESENT: THIRU. B. RAMALINGAM M.A.M.L.,                     : PRESIDENT

                 TMT. K.AMALA, M.A. L.L.B.,                                 : MEMBER I

                 DR. T.PAUL RAJASEKARAN, M.A PGDHRDI, AIII,BCS : MEMBER II

 

C.C.NO.222/2015

            WEDNESDAY THIS  27TH DAY OF JANUARY  2016     

K. Vijayakumar,

S/o. Krishnamurthy,

Plot No.56, Nesamani Nagar Main Road,

Perumbakkam,

Chennai 600 100.                                         ..Complainant

                                            ..Vs..

1. The Proprietor,

Cell Tech,

Shop No.8, Cision Complex,

First Floor,

Motietch Road,

Egmore,

Chennai 600 008.

 

2. The Manager,

Run Service Infocare Pvt. Ltd.,

No.7/1, North Main Road,

Anna Nagar West Extension,

Chennai 600 101.

 

3. The Managing Director,

Tablets Investments India Pvt. Ltd.,

Khasra No.605, Near Tata Telco.

Service Station, A Block,

Village Rangpuri,

(Mahipalpur) New Delhi 110 037.                 ..Opposite parties. 

 

                                            

For the Complainant                  :   Party in person   

For the Opposite party-1            :   M/s. M.Manikandhan & another

For the Opposite parties 2 & 3    :   Dismissed.

 

          Complaint under section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act 1986.  Complaint is filed seeking direction against the opposite parties to return the tables in working condition or to return the cost of the tablet and to pay a sum of Rs.2,50,000/- towards mental agony and also to pay cost of the complaint to the complainant.

 

ORDER

THIRU. B. RAMALINGAM PRESIDENT

 

          Heard, In view of the endorsement made by the complainant in person on this complaint, today this complaint is dismissed as withdrawn.  No cost.

 

MEMBER-I                        MEMBER-II                             PRESIDENT.

 
 
[ B.RAMALINGAM., MA., ML.,]
PRESIDENT
 
[ Dr.Paul Rajasekaran.,M.A.,D.MIN,HRDI,AIII,BCS]
MEMBER
 
[ K.AMALA., M.A., L.L.B.,]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.