Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

A/389/2014

S. JAYARAMAN - Complainant(s)

Versus

THE PROPRIETOR, PALAMUTHIR SUPER MARKET - Opp.Party(s)

PARTY IN PERSON

24 Apr 2015

ORDER

 

BEFORE THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,CHENNAI

BEFORE :  THIRU.J.JAYARAM                                   PRESIDING JUDICIAL MEMBER

                                                      TMT.P.BAKIYAVATHI                               MEMBER                                      

                                                                                               F.A.NO. 389/2014

(Against the order in CCSR.No.195/2014, dated 11.06.2014 on the file of DCDRF, Coimbatore)

DATED THIS THE 24^th DAY OF APRIL 2015

S.Jayaraman,

S/o.Shanmuga Nadar,

6/125, 3^rd Street, P.M.Sami Colony,                     Appellant / Complainant

R.S.Puram, Coimbatore 641 002.

 

                              Vs

Proprietor,

Pazhamudir Super Market,

Trichy Road, Ramanathapuram,                          Respondent / Opposite party

Coimbatore 641 045.

          This appeal coming before us for final hearing on 19.03.2015 and on hearing the arguments on the side of the appellant and upon perusing the material records, this Commission made the following order:

Appellant  / Complainant              :  S.Jayaraman, Inperson              

Respondent/ Opposite party          :              

ORDER

 

J.JAYARAM, PRESIDING JUDICIAL MEMBER

          This appeal is filed by the complainant against the order of the District Forum, Coimbatore in CC.SR.No.195/2014 dated 11.6.2014 rejecting the complaint.

2.       Appellant already heard.  Records perused.

3.       It is pertinent to note that the District Forum has rejected the complaint on the sole ground that the name of the appellant / complainant has not been noted in the cash receipt to establish that he purchased the articles from the opposite party.

4.       The complaint can be disposed of after due enquiry on merits.  The District Forum has erred in rejecting the complaint at the premature stage.

5.       In the result, the appeal is allowed, setting aside the order of the District Forum rejecting the complaint and the District Forum is directed to take the complaint on file.

 

 

P.BAKIYAVATHI                                                              J.JAYARAM

      MEMBER                                                                PRESIDING JUDICIAL MEMBER

 

INDEX : YES/ NO

VL/D;/PJM/consumer