Kerala

Kozhikode

CC/499/2016

SOJI P JOSEPH - Complainant(s)

Versus

THE PROPRIETOR,BIG BAZAR - Opp.Party(s)

26 Oct 2023

ORDER

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
KARANTHUR PO,KOZHIKODE
 
Complaint Case No. CC/499/2016
( Date of Filing : 18 Nov 2016 )
 
1. SOJI P JOSEPH
SOJI VILLA,MAYANADU PO,CALICUT
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. THE PROPRIETOR,BIG BAZAR
EMARALD MALL BUILDING,MAVOOR ROAD
2. BIG BAZAR
EMARALD MALL BUILDING,MAVOOR ROAD-4
3. E ZONE,FUTURE RETAIL LTD
STORE ADDRESS E ZONE,3RD FLOOR,BIG BAZAR,EMARALD MALL BUILDING,MAVOOR ROAD-4
4. FUTURE RETAIL LTD
TOWER C,9TH FLOOR,247 PARK,L B S MARG,VIKHROLI,MUMBAI
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. P.C .PAULACHEN , M.Com, LLB PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. V. BALAKRISHNAN ,M TECH ,MBA ,LLB, FIE Member
 HON'BLE MRS. PRIYA . S , BAL, LLB, MBA (HRM) MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 26 Oct 2023
Final Order / Judgement

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KOZHIKODE

PRESENT: Sri. P.C. PAULACHEN, M.Com, LLB    : PRESIDENT

Smt. PRIYA.S, BAL, LLB, MBA (HRM) :  MEMBER

Sri.V. BALAKRISHNAN, M Tech, MBA, LL.B, FIE: MEMBER

Thursday the 26th day of October 2023

C.C.499/2016

Complainant

             Soji.P.Joseph,

‘Soji villa’, Mayanadu Post,

Calicut -673 008,

                   (By Adv. Sri. Pavithran.K)

Opposite Parties

  1.         The proprietor,

Big Bazar,

Emarald Mall Building,

P.V.S City Park, Mavoor road,

Calicut – 673004.

  1.         Big Bazar,

Emarald Mall Building,

P.V.S City Park, Mavoor road,

Calicut – 673004.

  1.        E Zone,

Future Retail Limited,

Store Address: E zone (Adivision of FRL),

3rd floor, Big Bazar,

Emarald Mall Building,

P.V.S City Park, Mavoor road,

Calicut – 673004.

  1.        Future Retail Limited,

Tower-C, 9th floor, 247 Park,

                  L.B.S MARG, Vikhroli (west)

Mumbai -400 083, Maharashtra.

 

ORDER

 By Sri. P.C. PAULACHEN  – PRESIDENT

          The complaint is filed   deficiency of service and unfair trade practice on the part of the opposite parties and seeking refund of the purchase price of the TV, along with compensation.    

  1.  The opposite parties filed written version denying all the allegations and claims made against them.  
  2. The complainant remained absent and there is no representation for him. The onus is on the complainant to prove the allegations. The complainant is continuously absent and it appears that he is not interested in pursuing the matter. No deficiency of service or unfair trade practice as alleged is proved against the opposite parties.

In the result, the complaint is dismissed. No order as to costs.  

Pronounced in open Commission on this, the 26th day of October, 2023.

 

Date of Filing:  18.11.2016

                                      Sd/-                                                       Sd/-                                                       Sd/-

                             PRESIDENT                                            MEMBER                                           MEMBER

APPENDIX

NIL

 

                                     Sd/-                                                          Sd/-                                                      Sd/-

                            PRESIDENT                                               MEMBER                                            MEMBER

 

 

True Copy,      

                                                                                           

                                                                                                                                                                        Sd/-

                                                                                                                                                             Assistant Registrar.      

 

                                    

 

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. P.C .PAULACHEN , M.Com, LLB]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. V. BALAKRISHNAN ,M TECH ,MBA ,LLB, FIE]
Member
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. PRIYA . S , BAL, LLB, MBA (HRM)]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.