Kerala

Kasaragod

CC/08/113

V.Janardhanan - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Proprietor - Opp.Party(s)

25 Aug 2008

ORDER


judgements
Fort Road,Kasaragod
consumer case(CC) No. CC/08/113

V.Janardhanan		 ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.

The Proprietor		 ...........Respondent(s)


BEFORE:
1. K.T.Sidhiq 2. P.P.Shymaladevi 3. P.Ramadevi

Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):
1. V.Janardhanan

OppositeParty/Respondent(s):
1. The Proprietor

OppositeParty/Respondent(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):




Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KASARAGOD CC.No.113/08 Dated this, the 25th day of August 2008 PRESENT SRI.K.T.SIDHIQ : PRESIDENT SMT.P.RAMADEVI : MEMBER SMT.SHYMALADEVI : MEMBER V.Janardhanan, S/o.Narayanan Nair, } Complainant R/at Koovatty, Po.Chayiyoth. 1. The Proprietor, Digital World, I-390, Ram Nagar Road,} Opposite parties Kottacherry, Kanhangad. 2. The Proprietor, Essel Agro Private Ltd, Essel House, B,10, Lawerance Road, Industrial Area, New Delhi. 110035. O R D E R Complainant represented. For Opposite party No.2, Adv.Srikanta Shetty filed Vakalath. Complainant and Opposite party No.1 filed a compromise petition stating that the matter is settled between the parties and the complainant do not want to proceed with the case. Hence the complaint is dismissed as settled. Sd/- Sd/- Sd/- MEMBER MEMBER PRESIDENT Pj/ Forwarded by Order SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT




......................K.T.Sidhiq
......................P.P.Shymaladevi
......................P.Ramadevi