Orissa

Ganjam

CC/13/2017

Jaya Kishore Sahu - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Proprietor - Opp.Party(s)

For the complainant: Sri Rabinarayan Pathy, Advocate & Associates.

05 Feb 2024

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, GANJAM, BERHAMPUR.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/13/2017
( Date of Filing : 16 Mar 2017 )
 
1. Jaya Kishore Sahu
S/o. Late Binod Bihari Sahu, Govt. Service by Occupation, At. 4th Floor, Sai Complex, P.O. Gandhi Nagar, Berhampur Town, Dist- Ganjam, Odisha.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Proprietor
M/S. Shivani Electronics and Appliances, (A Unit of Mohapatra Stores), At. Cantonment Road, Berhampur Town, District - Ganjam.
2. The Managing Director
Samsung India Pvt. Ltd. 20 to 24th floors, Harizons-2, Golf course Road, Sector-43, Gurgaon, 122002.
3. The Proprietor, Subham Electronics
Authorized Samsung Service Centre, Gandhi nagar 1st line extension, Behind Sai complex, Po: Berhampur, Dist: Ganjam
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Satish Kumar Panigrahi PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Saritri Pattanaik MEMBER
 
PRESENT:For the complainant: Sri Rabinarayan Pathy, Advocate & Associates. , Advocate for the Complainant 1
 For the O.P.No.1: NONE., Advocate for the Opp. Party 1
 For the O.P.No.2 & 3: Sri Kailash Chandra Mishra, Advocate & Associates. , Advocate for the Opp. Party 1
Dated : 05 Feb 2024
Final Order / Judgement

 

                                                            DATE OF DISPOSAL: 05.02.2024.

 

 

 

EXTRACT COPY OF ORDER DATED 05.02.2024

 

            Both the parties found absent on repeated calls and no steps filed by either parties. On perusal of the record it is found that the complainant is absent more than 2 years and in any point of time he has not taken any steps to proceed with the case. It deems that, the complainant does not want to proceed in the present complaint. The complainant failed to perform his obligatory duty to remain present at the time of hearing as required under Rule 4 sub-Rule 8 of Consumer Protection Rules, 1987.

In the result, we dismissed the complaint for default under Rule-4 Sub-Rule 8 of C.P. Rules 1987.

This case is disposed of accordingly.

      The Judgment be uploaded on the www.confonet.nic.in for the perusal of the parties.

A certified copy of this Judgment be provided to all the parties free of cost as mandated by the Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

            The file is to be consigned to the record room along with a copy of this Judgment.

                                                                                                

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Satish Kumar Panigrahi]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Saritri Pattanaik]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.