Kerala

Kollam

CC/12/2019

Deva Krishna,aged 19 years, - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Proprietor, - Opp.Party(s)

Adv.SHAJAN CHERIAN JOHN

30 Mar 2022

ORDER

Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum
Civil Station , Kollam-691013.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/12/2019
( Date of Filing : 22 Jan 2019 )
 
1. Deva Krishna,aged 19 years,
S/o.Krishnakumar,Kuttikattu Gardens, SV.Market.P.O,Karunagappally.P.O,Kollam District-690 518.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Proprietor,
Galaxy Communications, Samsung Authorised Service Centre,2nd Floor,KP-III-3/ 2410,King City Arcade,Karunagappally,Kollam-690518.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. E.M.MUHAMMED IBRAHIM PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. SANDHYA RANI.S MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. STANLY HAROLD MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 30 Mar 2022
Final Order / Judgement

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL  COMMISSION, KOLLAM

Dated this the   30th  Day of  March      2022

 

  Present: -  Sri. E.M.Muhammed Ibrahim, B.A, LL.M. President

      Smt.S.Sandhya Rani, Bsc, L.L.B, Member

      Sri.Stanly Harold,  B.A.LLB,  Member

 

                                                                          CC.12/2019

 

Deva Krishna                                                   :         Complainant

S/o Krishnakumar,

Kuttikattu Gardens

SV.Market P.O,

Karunagappally P.O

Kollam-690518.

[By Adv.Shajan Cherian John&

Adv.Asha.K.Varghese]

 

V/s

 

  1.  The Proprietor                                             :         Opposite party

          Galaxy Communications

          SAMSUNG Authorized Service Centre

          2nd Floor,

          KP-III-3/2410

         King City Arcade,

         Karunagappally,

         Kollam-690518.

        [By Adv.R.Abdul Muneer]

 

FINAL   ORDER

E.M.MUHAMMED IBRAHIM , B.A, LL.M, President

            Complainant absent today also.  Advocate also absent.  Junior Advocate filed a petition seeking 3 months time to adduce evidence.  The case is posted for disposal as the complainant is regularly absent when the case was posted for recording evidence.  The learned counsel for the complainant has not even filed a petition to review that order but filed a petition seeking 3 months time to adduce evidence which cannot be allowed without reviewing the last order posting the case for disposal.  The allegations in the complainant can be proved by documentary  evidence but the learned counsel for the complainant has not attempted to do so.  The documents produced along with complaint are only photo copies of the documents.

          In the circumstances we are of the view that the complainant is not interested in prosecuting  the complaint.

          In the result complaint stands dismissed for default.

          No costs.

Dated this the  30th    day of    March   2022.

 

 

E.M.Muhammed Ibrahim:Sd/-

S.Sandhya Rani:Sd/-

             Stanly Harold:Sd/-

            Forwarded/by Order

           Senior Superintendent

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. E.M.MUHAMMED IBRAHIM]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. SANDHYA RANI.S]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. STANLY HAROLD]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.