Gopal Singh Adhikari filed a consumer case on 10 Jun 2019 against The Proprietor Vimala Enterprises in the Rayagada Consumer Court. The case no is CC/160/2017 and the judgment uploaded on 03 Aug 2019.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
POST / DIST: Rayagada, STATE: ODISHA, Pin No. 765001.
******************
C.C. Case No. 160 / 2017. Date. 10 . 06 . 2019.
P R E S E N T .
Dr. Aswini Kumar Mohapatra, President
Sri Gadadhara Sahu, Member.
Smt.Padmalaya Mishra, Member
Sri Gopal Singh Adhikari, S/O: Sri D.S.Adhikari, Brahmin Street, Po/Dist: Rayagada , 765 011 (Odisha). … Complainant.
Versus.
1.The Propritor, Vimala Enterprises, Goutam Nagar,5th. Lane, backside of womens college, Rayagada.
2.The Chief Executive Officer, Videocon D2h Ltd. Ist. Floor Techweb Centre, New link road, Oshiwara Jogeshwari(West), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India- 400 102. ..Opposite parties.
For the Complainant:- Self..
For the O.Ps :- In person.
JUDGEMENT
The factual matrix of the case is that the above named complainant alleging deficiency in service against afore mentioned O.Ps for non provide of T.V. network for which the complainant sought for redressal of the grievances raised by the complainant.
On being noticed the O.Ps. appeared in person and filed Memo. Though the O.Ps have not filed written version but after receipt of the notice from this forum the parties are amicable settled between the complainant and O.Ps outside the forum and the complainant filed a memo submitted that on DT. 19.01.2018
the service centre of Videocon d2h company had came to his house and made repair of Videocon d2h machine. Now the said machine is running good condition. The complainant further submitted that he wants withdrawal of the above case. Hence the O.Ps prays the forum to close the case accordingly .
Heard arguments from the O.Ps and from the complainant. Perused the record, documents, filed by the parties.
This forum examined the entire material on record and given a thoughtful consideration to the arguments advanced before us by the parties touching the points both on the facts as well as on law.
This forum observed the O.Ps considering the exigencies of the matter with out any basis in the right time properly settled the disputes at his end to avoid further litigation by overlooking all the deficiencies without contesting the present case in the sense of humanitarian point of view by following the principles of natural justice in view of justice as contemplated the Modos Operandi of the O.Ps no doubt worthy of credence.
During the course of hearing the complainant also consented to close the above case against the O.Ps
We perused the documents filed by the complainant as well as the O.Ps. In our considered view there is nothing to disbelieve the contents of the O.Ps regarding their service to the satisfaction of the complainant and forum do not find any reason to hold the O.Ps.
Accordingly the present dispute mitigated and the case stands disposed and O.Ps wriggled out of liabilities & the case closed against them as the complainant do not want to proceed with the case further against the O.Ps after received service from the O.Ps. Parties are left to bear their own cost.
Dictated and corrected by me
Pronounced on this 10th. Day of June, 2019.
Member. Member. President
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.