West Bengal

Maldah

EA/08/1

Sri Monindra Nath Misra - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Proprietor, The Planet - Opp.Party(s)

Manoj Bhattacharaya

29 Apr 2008

ORDER


District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Malda
Satya Chowdhuri Indoor Stadium , Malda
Execution Application(EA) No. EA/08/1

Sri Monindra Nath Misra
...........Appellant(s)

Vs.

The Proprietor, The Planet
The Proprietor, Digital Home
...........Respondent(s)


BEFORE:


Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):
1. Sri Monindra Nath Misra

OppositeParty/Respondent(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):
1. Manoj Bhattacharaya

OppositeParty/Respondent(s):




ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

 

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MALDA,
MALDA D.F. EXECUTION CASE NO.01/2008
ARISING OUT OF ORIGINAL CASE No.59/2007.
 
Date of filing of the Case: 05.02.2008
 

Complainant
Opposite Parties
Sri Mahindra Nath Mishra (55)
Son of late Tarapada Mishra
Resident of Vill. Araidanga
P.O. Araidanga,
P.S. Ratua, Dist. Malda.
1.
The Proprietor
The Planet
28/31, Rabindra Avenue,
P.S. English Bazar,
P.O. & Dist. Malda.
PIN No. – 732101.
2.
The Proprietor
Digital Home
No.1 Govt. Colony
P.S. English Bazar,
P.O.& Dist. Malda
PIN No. – 732101.

 

Present:
1.
Shri A.K. Sinha,           Member
2.
Smt. Sumana Das,        Member
 
 

 
For the Petitioner :              Manoj Bhattacharyya, Advocates.
 
For the O.Ps.          None appeared.
                                
Order No. 08  Dt. 29.04.2008
 
          Petitioner is personally present alongwith his Ld. Advocate. Petitioner Shri Manindra Nath Mishra stated is open ejlash that the mobile set in question was received by him from his advocate and he has been using the same which is functioning properly in sending and receiving calls but he presumes the sound is little bit low. He also admitted that the set was produced in Forum during the proceeding when it was totally defunct and company / O.P. returned with remark ‘liquid damage’. How he is satisfied at present with his mobile set.
 
Hence,                                     ordered,
that the Execution case No.01/2008 disposed of with full satisfaction.
                   Sd/-                               Sd/-                              
                   Sumana Das                  A. K. Sinha                                  
                   Member                         Member                               
D.C.D.R.F., Malda         D.C.D.R.F., Malda