Pondicherry

StateCommission

A/9/2014

Ramu S/o Vairavan - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Proprietor, Saratha's - Opp.Party(s)

R.Asvani Palaniappan

20 Nov 2014

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
First Appeal No. A/9/2014
(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. CC/78/2007 of District Pondicherry)
 
1. Ramu S/o Vairavan
No.5,Upstairs,4th cross, Jawahar Nagar, Pondicherry-5
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. The Proprietor, Saratha's
No.141,Jawaharlal Nehru Street, Pondicherry-1
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.VENKATARAMAN PRESIDENT
 
For the Appellant:
For the Respondent:
ORDER

BEFORE THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT PUDUCHERRY

 

THURSDAY, the 20th day of November, 2014

 

First Appeal No.9/2014

 

Ramu, S/o Vairavan                                                ……….                                                  Appellant

           

                                                                             Vs.

 

The Proprietor,

Saratha's, Puducherry                                …………                                       Respondent

 

(On appeal against the order passed by the District Forum, Puducherry in Consumer Complaint No.78 of 2007, dated 14.03.2014)

 

 

Consumer Complaint No.78 of 2007

 

Ramu, S/o Vairavan                                                ……….                                           Complainant

           

                                                                             Vs.

 

The Proprietor,

Saratha's, Puducherry                                …………                                   Opposite Party

 

 

BEFORE:

 

HON’BLE THIRU JUSTICE K.VENKATARAMAN

PRESIDENT

 

TMT.K.K.RITHA,

MEMBER

 

 

FOR APPELLANT/COMPLAINANT.:

 

Thiru K.Palaniappan

Advocate, Puducherry.

 

FOR RESPONDENT/O.P..:

 

Thiru S.Tamilselvan,

Advocate, Puducherry

 

 

O  R  D  E  R

(By Hon’ble Justice President)

 

            This appeal is directed against the order of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Puducherry in Consumer Complaint No.78/2007, dated 14.03.2014 in dismissing the complaint.

            2. Last occasion we have heard the arguments of the respondent/O.P. and posted the matter today for appellant's arguments. Both the parties were present before this Commission and agreed for a settlement. As per the compromise between them, the respondent/O.P. has returned a sum of Rs.4,900/- being the value of the saree purchased by the appellant/complainant. The appellant/complainant also received the same and reported that the appeal could be disposed of noting the same.   3. The appellant/complainant has made an endorsement stating that he has received the money from the respondent/O.P. and also made an endorsement withdrawing the allegations made by him against the respondent/O.P.

            4. Hence, the appeal stands closed recording the compromise entered into between the parties. As far as the saree is concerned  , as agreed between the parties, the same has been returned to the respondent/O.P.

Dated this the 20th day of November, 2014

 

(Justice K.VENKATARAMAN)

PRESIDENT

 

 

 

(K.K.RITHA)

MEMBER

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.VENKATARAMAN]
PRESIDENT

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.