BEFORE THE A.P.STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSALHYDERABAD.

F.A.No.330/2011

Between:

M/s.Dealer of Hero Honda, 22-1-24,

SanthiRep. by its Proprietor SriS/

                                                                                  1.Patapanjula  

2. The Additional Transport Authority,

   Vijayawada.

Counsel for the Appellant M/s. 

Counsel for the                                       

F.A.No.943/2011 

Between:

PatapanjulaR/oKhurdush                                                                                                      And

1.The Proprietor,

 M/s.Dealer of Hero Honda, 22-1-24,

Santhi 

2.The Additional Transport Authority,

Counsel for the Appellant   M/s. 

Counsel for the                                        

QUORUM: SMT.M.SHREESHA, HON’BLE INCHARGE PRESIDENT,

MONDAY, THE    

TWO THOUSAND THIRTEEN                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        .

Oral                                

           F.A.No.330/  

TheThe complainant approached the opposite party   

           opposite party no.1                                              

1.  Whether the

2.  Whether the impugned order of the District Forum is liable to

3.     

              issued by opposite party no.1   

It is the case of the opposite party no.1, that they sold 2010 model vehicle, but not 2009      The     the              those         relate to the consignment sent under Ex.B1 

Further, if the vehicle  

The next contention of the appellant/opposite party no.1 is that at the time               

Further, it is           

Coming to           F.A.No.330/2011: In the        that the company stopped manufacturing of the Hero Honda Passion Plus bike fromst

F.A.No.943/2011:  

     Pm*