Tamil Nadu

Thiruvallur

RBT/CC/61/2022

Gurumoorthy - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Proprietor manager Rohini Cinema theatre - Opp.Party(s)

M.Guromoorthy -C

17 Oct 2022

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
THIRUVALLUR
No.1-D, C.V.NAIDU SALAI, 1st CROSS STREET,
THIRUVALLUR-602 001
 
Complaint Case No. RBT/CC/61/2022
 
1. Gurumoorthy
koyambedu ch-107
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Proprietor manager Rohini Cinema theatre
ch-107
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  TMT.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESWARI, M.A.,M.L.,Ph.D(Law) PRESIDENT
  THIRU.J.JAYASHANKAR, B.A.,B.L., MEMBER
  THIRU.P.MURUGAN, M.Com, ICWA (Inter), B.L., MEMBER
 
PRESENT:M.Guromoorthy -C, Advocate for the Complainant 1
 Karthick Raja - OP, Advocate for the Opp. Party 1
Dated : 17 Oct 2022
Final Order / Judgement

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
THIRUVALLUR

 BEFORE  TMT. Dr.S.M. LATHA MAHESWARI, M.A.,M.L, Ph.D (Law)                                     .…. PRESIDENT
                 THIRU.J.JAYASHANKAR. B.A.,B.L.,                                                                               ....MEMBER -I
                 THIRU P.MURUGAN, M.Com., ICWA(Inter)., B.L.,                                                   ….. MEMBER-II

CC. No.61/2022
THIS MONDAY, THE 17th DAY OF OCTOBER 2022

Mr. M.Gurumoorthy, S/o.K.Mani,
No.38/2 North Mada Street,
Koyambedu, Chennai -600 107.                                                                                    ....Complainant.
                                                                                       //Vs//
The Proprietor/Manager,
Rohini Cinema Theatre,
(Rohini Complex),
No,141/2, Poonamallee High Road,
Koyambedu, Chennai 107.                                                                                         ....Opposite party.
 
ORDER
PRONOUNCED BY TMT. Dr.S.M. LATHA MAHESWARI,   PRESIDENT.

               The complaint was filed by the complainant U/S 12 of the Consumer Protection Act 1986 alleging deficiency in service in collecting extra amount above the government rates along with a prayer to direct the opposite party to refund Rs.110/- collected from him for extra charges and to pay a sum of Rs.50,000/- towards compensation for the mental agony caused to the complainant along with cost of the proceedings.
Opposite party written argument filed.  Notice of transfer served on complainant. No representation for the complainant in spite of information given from commission and providing sufficient opportunities.  Hence, this commission posted this matter today for appearance of complainant or for dismissal.  Today also there is no representation.  Matter passed over and called twice to file written argument and to make oral argument but there was no representation.  Hence, we are of the view that there is no purpose in keeping the complaint on file.  Hence the consumer complaint is dismissed for non prosecution.  No cost.
This order was pronounced by us in the open Commission on this 17th October 2022. 

Sd/-                                                        Sd/-                                                            Sd/-

MEMBER-II                                        MEMBER-I                                             PRESIDENT

 
 
[ TMT.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESWARI, M.A.,M.L.,Ph.D(Law)]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[ THIRU.J.JAYASHANKAR, B.A.,B.L.,]
MEMBER
 
 
[ THIRU.P.MURUGAN, M.Com, ICWA (Inter), B.L.,]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.