Orissa

Baleshwar

CC/10/2018

Smt. Purnimamani Behera, aged 52 years - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Proprietor, Geetanjali Motors, Kuruda - Opp.Party(s)

Sri Sarat Kumar Rout & others

23 Apr 2024

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BALASORE
AT- KATCHERY HATA, NEAR COLLECTORATE, P.O, DIST- BALASORE-756001
 
Complaint Case No. CC/10/2018
( Date of Filing : 30 Jan 2018 )
 
1. Smt. Purnimamani Behera, aged 52 years
W/o. Srustidhar Behera, At- Gambhalundi, P.O- Irda, P.S- Singla, Dist- Balasore.
Odisha
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Proprietor, Geetanjali Motors, Kuruda
Near N.H-5 Over Bridge, Opp. side of Sadar Police Station, Balasore.
Odisha
2. The Concerned Authority, Preet Agro Industries Pvt. Ltd., Punjab
Patiala Road, Nabha, Punjab-147201.
Punjab
3. The Concerned Authority, Magma Fincorp Limited, Kolkata
Magma House, 24, Park Street, Kolkata-700016.
West Bengal
4. The Branch Manager, Magma Fincorp Limited, Balia
1st Floor, Sahadebkhunta, In front of Canara Bank, Balia, Balasore.
Odisha
5. Sapan Barik, Balasore
S/o. Gangadhar Barik, At- Chandipur, P.O- Haldipada, P.S- Basta, Dist- Balasore.
Odisha
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. NILAKANTHA PANDA PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. JIBAN KRUSHNA BEHERA MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 23 Apr 2024
Final Order / Judgement

                                         The case is posted today for consideration of memo of complainant & memo filed by O.Ps No.1 & 2 and hearing. Advocate for the complainant is absent, no steps filed. Advocates for the O.Ps are absent, no steps filed. On repeated calls, none respond on behalf of the complainant. Hence, hearing of the case could not be taken up. Perused the case record.

                                         In the present case, the O.Ps were appeared & filed their separate w/vs. As it appears from the case record that the complainant remained absent since 24.12.19 to till today, for which hearing of the case impaired & the valuable time of this Commission is being wasted. Considering the nature & conduct of the complainant and memos filed by both the Advocates for complainant & O.Ps No.1 & 2, this Commission is of the view that the complaint of the complainant should be dismissed.   

                                         Accordingly, the complaint of the complainant is dismissed for non-prosecution of the case. The interim order, if any, passed against the O.Ps is treated to be infructuous. Both the memos filed by both the Advocates for complainant & O.Ps No.1 & 2 are disposed of accordingly.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. NILAKANTHA PANDA]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JIBAN KRUSHNA BEHERA]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.