DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
THIRUVALLUR

 BEFORE  TMT. Dr.S.M. LATHA MAHESWARI, M.A.,M.L, Ph.D (Law)                          .…. PRESIDENT
                 THIRU.J.JAYASHANKAR. B.A.,B.L.,                                                                    ....MEMBER -I
                 THIRU P.MURUGAN, M.Com., ICWA(Inter)., B.L.,                                        ….. MEMBER-II

CC. No.63/2022
THIS WEDNESDAY, THE 26th  DAY OF OCTOBER 2022

Mr.M.Deva, S/o.Munusamy,
No.53/17, Apparsamy Koil Street,
Thiruvotriyur, Chennai -19.                                                                                              ....Complainant.
                                                                                       //Vs//
1.The Proprietor, Amsa Vision,
   Office at No.349, T.H. Road,
   Old Washermenpet, Chennai – 600 021.

2.Videocon, Rep. by its Manager,
    Plot No.296, Udyogvitar,
    Phase -2, Gurgon -122 015, Haryana.                                                                   ....Opposite parties

Counsel for the complainant                                                                 : M/s.Karunakaran, Advocate.
Counsel for the opposite parties                                                          : exparte.
 
ORDER
PRONOUNCED BY TMT. Dr. S.M. LATHA MAHESWARI,   PRESIDENT.

               The complaint was filed by the complainant U/S 12 of the Consumer Protection Act 1986 alleging deficiency in service against the opposite parties in selling defective television along with a prayer to direct the opposite parties to refund a sum of Rs.16,000/- paid by the complainant for the purchase of the television and to pay a sum of Rs.4,00,000/- as compensation for the mental agony and hardship caused to the complainant with 12% interest per annum from the date of complaint till realization along with cost of the proceedings.
No representation for the complainant.  Notice of transfer served on the complainant on 18.07.2022.  Inspite of sufficient opportunities and information provided by this commission, no proof affidavit was filed.   Hence, this commission is of the view that no purpose in keeping the complaint on file.  Hence the consumer complaint is dismissed for non prosecution.  No cost.
This order was pronounced by us in the open Commission on this 26th October 2022. 

     Sd/-                                                     Sd/-                                                            Sd/-

MEMBER-II                                        MEMBER-I                                             PRESIDENT