Tamil Nadu

North Chennai

CC/115/2016

Dhilip.T - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Proprietary Joycors.in - Opp.Party(s)

Party In Person

24 May 2017

ORDER

                                                                           Complaint presented on:  13.07.2016

                                                                               Order pronounced on:  24.05.2017

 

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, CHENNAI (NORTH)

    2^nd Floor, Frazer Bridge Road, V.O.C.Nagar, Park Town, Chennai-3

 

PRESENT: THIRU.K.JAYABALAN, B.Sc., B.L.,        PRESIDENT

                    TMT.T.KALAIYARASI, B.A.B.L.:           MEMBER II

 

THURSDAY THE 24^th  DAY OF MAY 2017

 

                                      C.C.NO.115/2016

 

 

Dhilip T,

Son of M.Tamizharasan,

No.56, Bharathidasan Street,

Dr.R.K.Nagar, Ariyankuppam,

Pondicherry – 605 007.                                                             ..... Complainant

 

                                     ..Vs..

 

The Proprietary,

JOYCARS.IN,

No. 54/8 East Club Road,

Shenoy Nagar,Chennai – 600 030.

                                                                  

                                                                                      …..Opposite party       

 

 

Date of complaint                                                :15.07.2016

Counsel for complainant                          :Party in Person

Counsel for Opposite Party                      : Ex – parte

 

 

 

 

O R D E R

 

BY PRESIDENT THIRU. K.JAYABALAN B.SC., B.L.,

This complaint is filed by the complainant u/s 12 of the Consumer Protection Act.1986.

The Complainant filed this Complaint as party in person and the same was taken of file on 15.07.2016 and the first hearing posted to 18.08.2016. 

          On the first hearing the Opposite Party did not appear and hence fresh notice to them was ordered privately and adjourned to 16.09.2016. There after several hearings adjourned to send notice to the Opposite Party privately by the Complainant.  However the Complainant did not take any steps on none of the hearings and also he did not appear for any hearing. Finally on 30.3.2017 hearing the case adjourned to 26.4.2017 hearing and from 26.4.2017 adjourned to 24.5.2017 (today) directing the Complainant to send fresh notice to the Opposite Party as last chance failing to take steps the Complaint will be dismissed.   

         Even after such ultimatum, the Complainant has not chosen to appear before this forum and to take steps by sending fresh notice to the Opposite Party.  The above attitude of the Complainant failed to take steps leads to an irresistible conclusion that the Complainant has no interest in prosecuting the Complaint and hence the Complaint is liable to be dismissed.                                    

     In the result, the Complaint is dismissed for non prosecution.

                   Pronounced by us on this 24^th   day of May 2017.

       Sd/-                                                                                      Sd/-        

MEMBER –II                                                               PRESIDENT

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                 

      -