Sri B.Naresh Kumar filed a consumer case on 14 Jan 2019 against The Propreitor Laxshmi Motors in the Rayagada Consumer Court. The case no is CC/39/2018 and the judgment uploaded on 13 Mar 2019.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, RAYAGADA,
STATE: ODISHA.
C.C. Case No. 39 / 2018. Date. 14 . 01 . 2019.
P R E S E N T .
Dr. Aswini Kumar Mohapatra, President
Sri GadadharaSahu, Member.
Smt.PadmalayaMishra,. Member
Sri B.Naresh Kumar, S/O B.Shankar Rao, AT:Bhawani Street, ward No.5, Rayagada Po/Dist: Rayagada , 765 001 (Odisha). …. Complainant.
Versus.
1.The Propritor, Lakshmi Motors, Dealer of India Yamaha Motors pvt. Ltd., Near ICICI bank, M.G.Road, Jeypore,Dist: Koraput(Odisha).
2. The Manager, M/S. Platinum Motors, 1-15-1, Besides Luthern Church, CBNC colony, Near R&B Junction, Vizianagaram.
3.The Service Manager, Dealer of India Yamaha Motors pvt. Ltd.,501, 5th. Floor, Vakratunda Corporate park, Visveshwar Nagar, Kalasilk Compound, Opposite Aarey Road, Gurgaon, East, Mumbai-400063. … Opposite parties.
For the Complainant:- Self.
For the O.Ps:- Sri J.K.Mohapatra, Advocate, Rayagada.
JUDGEMENT
The factual matrix of the case is that the above named complainant alleging deficiency in service against afore mentioned O.Ps for non rectification of defects towards Yamaha Motors cycle within the warranty period free of charges for which the complainant sought for redressal of the grievances raised by the complainant.
On being noticed the O.Ps. appeared through their learned counsel and defend the case. Though the O.Ps have not filed written version but after receipt of the notice from this forum the O.Ps have replaced the necessary parts of the Yamaha Motors cycle bearing Regd. No.18-D-2199 free of cost. To substantiate the same the O.Ps have filed job card Dt. 15.5.2018 where in the complainant has signed and also satisfied with the service given by the O.Ps. Hence the O.Ps prays the forum to close the case accordingly .
Heard arguments from the learned counsel for the O.Ps and from the complainant. Perused the record, documents, filed by the parties.
This forum examined the entire material on record and given a thoughtful consideration to the arguments advanced before us by the parties touching the points both on the facts as well as on law.
FINDINGS.
From the records it reveals that, there is no dispute that the complainant had purchased a Yamaha Motor cycle YZF-R15 from the from the O.P. No.1 by paying a sum of Rs. 1,23,354/- with Retail Invoice No. 1034 dt. 10.06.2017 having warranty and registered in the name of the complainant vide Registration No. OD-18D/2197( Copies of the invoice is in the file which is marked as Annexure-I). But unfortunately within one month of its use the above two wheeler found defective and the complainant had detected a rough noise coming from the engine. The complainant complained to the O.P No.1 (service centre) for necessary repair. Even such service the above defects were persisting in the said set. So the complainant intimated the same to the O.P. No.1 for replacement of the defective parts in turn the OPs paid deaf ear. Hence this case.
On perusal of the record it is revealed that the fact of the purchase of above set is not denied by the O.Ps. It is admitted position the complainant having purchased above goods for consideration having the warrantee.
It is admitted position of law that when a goods sold by the manufacturer has under gone servicing the complainant is entitled to thoroughly check up of the above set and to remove the defects of the above set with fresh warrantee .
Coming to the merits of the case the complainant had purchased the above set from the O.P No. 1 on payment of consideration an amount of Rs. 1,23,354/- on Dt. 10.06.2017 (copies of the retail invoice) marked as Annexure-I. On perusal of the record we observed the complainant after using some months for rectification of defects handed over the same to the O.P. No.1 (Dealer) for repair.
As per the instruction of the complainant the O.Ps have given proper service in as much as the O.Ps have rectified all defects of the vehicle in question to the satisfaction of the complainant & there is no defect in the said vehicle job sheet annexed by him.
The O.Ps considering the exigencies of the matter with out any basis in the right time properly settled the disputes at his end to avoid further litigation by over looking all the deficiencies without contesting the present case in the sense of humanitarian point of view by following the principles of natural justice in view of justice as contemplated the Modos Operandi of the O.Ps no doubt worthy of credence.
During the course of hearing the complainant also consented to close the above case against the O.Ps
We perused the documents filed by the complainant as well as the O.Ps. In our considered view there is nothing to disbelieve the contents of the O.Ps regarding their service to the satisfaction of the complainant and forum do not find any reason to hold the O.Ps.
Accordingly the present dispute mitigated and the case stands disposed and but O.Ps wriggled out of liabilities & the case closed against them as the complainant do not want to proceed with the case further against the O.Ps after rectification the defects of the Motor cycle. Parties are left to bear their own cost.
Dictated and corrected by me
Pronounced on this 14th. Day of January, 2019.
Member. Member. President
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.