Tamil Nadu

North Chennai

153/2014

G.Keerthipriya, - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Principal, Sweetha School of Engineering,Saveetha University, - Opp.Party(s)

A.Palaniappan

20 Jul 2016

ORDER

 

 

                                                                            Complaint presented on:  09.05.2014

                                                                               Order pronounced on:  20.07.2016

 

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, CHENNAI (NORTH)

    2nd Floor, Frazer Bridge Road, V.O.C.Nagar, Park Town, Chennai-3

 

PRESENT: THIRU.K.JAYABALAN, B.Sc., B.L.,        PRESIDENT

                    TMT.T.KALAIYARASI, B.A.B.L.:           MEMBER II

 

WEDNESDAY THE 20th  DAY OF JULY 2016

 

                                      C.C.NO.153 /2014

 

 

Ms.G.Keerthi Priya,

No.15-2467, Johns Garden,

Palamaner Road, Chittor – 517 002.

                                                                                        ..... Complainant

 

                                     ..Vs..

 

1.The Principal,

Saveetha School of Engineering,

Saveetha University,

Saveetha Nagar, Thandalam,

Chennai – 602 105.

 

2.The Manager,

Edulive Infra India Pvt. Ltd.,

  1.  

Shanti Colony, Annanagar,

Chennai – 40.

 

3. The Managing Director,

Edulive Infra India Pvt. Ltd.,

The CPBM Office,

Edulive Infra India Pvt.Ltd.,

A4, Crystal Row House,

Behind Kapil Complex,

Near Balewadi Phata Baner Road,

Pune 411 045.

 

4.The Managing Director,

Shailesh J.Mehta School of Management,

Indian Institute of Technology Bombay,

Powai, Mumbai – 400 076.

 

5.The Deen,

Indian Institute of Technology Bombay,

Powai, Mumbai – 400 076.

 

                                                                       …..Opposite parties

 

 

 

 

Date of complaint                                           : 31.07.2014

Counsel for complainant                      : Mr.A.Palaniappan

Counsel for  1st  Opposite Party           : T.Ravi Kumar

Counsel for 2nd Opposite Party            : Ex- parte

Counsel for 3rd  Opposite Party           : Dismissed

Counsel for 4th & 5th  Opposite Party  : V.S.Ushrani

 

O R D E R

 

BY PRESIDENT THIRU. K.JAYABALAN B.SC., B.L.,

This complaint is filed by the complainant u/s 12 of the Consumer Protection Act.1986.

Counsel for Opposite Parties present. Opposite Parties already filed proof affidavit. Complainant not filed proof affidavit for the past 11 hearings. Even today 12th hearing the case posted as last chance for filling proof affidavit of Complainant, he has not filed the same till 2.55 p.m. Complainant also called absent till then. In spite of sufficient opportunity given to the Complainant to file her proof affidavit and she has not filed the same, shows that she has no interest in prosecuting the Complaint. Hence no purpose would be served even if the case is adjourned and therefore we have decided to dismiss the Complaint for want of evidence of the Complainant and accordingly this Complaint is dismissed. No costs.

                 Pronounced by us on this 20th  day of July 2016.

 

      -sd-                                                                                 -sd-     

MEMBER – II                                                              PRESIDENT       

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.