The Post Master & one another V/S M.V. Annaiah Charya - Consumer Court Case

Karnataka

Mysore

CPA/93/179

M.V. Annaiah Charya - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Post Master & one another - Opp.Party(s)

08 Oct 1996

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM MYSORE
No.1542/F, Anikethana Road, C and D Block, J.C.S.T. Layout, Kuvempunagara, (Behind Jagadamba Petrol Bunk), Mysore-570009.
consumer case(CC) No. CPA/93/179

M.V. Annaiah Charya						...........Appellant(s)
Vs.
The Post Master & one another The Senior Superintendent of Post Offices,						...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:

Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):

OppositeParty/Respondent(s):

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended

Highly recommended!

5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended

Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

Only Advocate for opposite party appears and prays for time. There is no sufficient ground to grant further time. The request for further time is refused. ORDER Complaintn is filed for non payment of the maturity value of the N.S.Cs. issued to the complainant. The opposite party has filed version denying that opposite party has committed any deficiency of service. The maturity value of the N.S.Cs has been paid to complainant on 5/8/1992. We do not see any unreasonable delay in payment of the amount. Complainant has not adduced any evidence to prove that opposite party has committed deficiency of service. In the circumstances the complaint is dismissed. No order as to costs.

Only Advocate for opposite party appears and prays for time. There is no sufficient ground to grant further time. The request for further time is refused. ORDER Complaintn is filed for non payment of the maturity value of the N.S.Cs. issued to the complainant. The opposite party has filed version denying that opposite party has committed any deficiency of service. The maturity value of the N.S.Cs has been paid to complainant on 5/8/1992. We do not see any unreasonable delay in payment of the amount. Complainant has not adduced any evidence to prove that opposite party has committed deficiency of service. In the circumstances the complaint is dismissed. No order as to costs.