DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KANDHAMAL, PHULBANI

C.C.NO. 115 OF 2023

                      Date of Filing: 02.06.2023

          Date of Order: 16.07.2024

Sri Debaraj Kanhar

S/O- Late Mada Kanhar

At/PO-Adakhola, Uperkhola, Muskusali

District- Kandhamal                               ………………….. Complainant

Versus.

          The P.A, ITDA

          Balliguda,

District-Kandhamal,762103                   ..………….….. Opposite Party

Present: Sri Purna Chandra Mishra    - President.

Sri Sudhakar Senapothi                               - Member.

For the Complainant: Self

For O.P.                    : Ld. A.G.P  B.Pattnaik, Advocate

JUDGEMENT

Mr. Sudhakar Senapothi, Member

          Complainant Debaraj Kanhar has filed this case u/s 35 of the CP Act-2019 alleging deficiency of service and harassment on the part of Opposite Party for non-payment of his dues by the Opposite Party and praying therein for direction to the Opposite Party to pay his dues and to pay cost and compensation for the loss and harassment sustained by him.

1. Brief fact leading to the case is that the complainant is a beneficiary of the Central Government being a Scheduled Tribe (ST) under the self-employment scheme. Government of India has provided financial assistance to the complainant for construction of tubewell through ITDA, Baliguda. Even though he completed the work, the cost of material and labour was not given to him for which, he filed this case before this Commission for the reliefs as discussed above.
2. After receipt of notice, Learned AGP entered appearance on behalf of the Opposite Party and filed written statement. In his written statement, the Opposite Party stated that the bill of the complainant has been prepared and the payment of the beneficiary has already been booked in online portal and the money has already been sent to his account. The complainant was present on the date of hearing and he admitted that the money has been credited in his accounts and further submitted that as the labour component has already been booked in the online portal, he is satisfied with the Opposite Party.
3. As the principal grievance of the complainant is redressed and as his name has already been included in the online portal for payment, he is satisfied with the performance of the Opposite Party. And hence the order.

O R D E R

The complaint petition is accordingly disposed of. Parties to bear their own cost.

I Agree                                                    Computerized & corrected by me.

PRESIDENT                                                        MEMBER

Pronounced in the open Commission today on this 16th day of July 2024.

        MEMBER                                                             PRESIDENT