Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

A/72/2016

K .Senthilkumar - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Oriental Insurance Company Limited, The Manager - Opp.Party(s)

M.K. Supradeeban

07 Feb 2020

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
First Appeal No. A/72/2016
( Date of Filing : 12 Apr 2016 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. CC/237/2013 of District North Chennai)
 
1. K .Senthilkumar
No. 218, 17th street, Periyar Nagar, Chennai-82
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. The Oriental Insurance Company Limited, The Manager
Service vertical centre, No. 115, Prakasam salai, Chennai-108
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Dr. S. TAMILVANAN PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. K BASKARAN JUDICIAL MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. TMT.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESHWARI MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 07 Feb 2020
Final Order / Judgement

BEFORE THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI – 600 003.

            BEFORE         Hon’ble Dr. Justice S.TAMILVANAN       PRESIDENT

                                        Thiru. K. BASKARAN                               JUDICIAL  MEMBER

                                      Tmt. Dr. S. M. LATHA MAHESWARI        MEMBER

 

F.A. No. 72/2016

[As against the order in CC.No.237/2013 dated:08.02.2016 on the file of

D.C.D.R.F., Chennai (North)]

                                                           DATED THE 07th  DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2020

 

K. Senthilkumar,

S/o. Mr. V. Govindan,

No.218, 17th Street,

Periyar Nagar,

Chennai – 600 082.                                                   .. Appellant / Complainant.

-Versus-

The Manager,

The Oriental Insurance Company Limited,

Service Vertical Centre,

No.115, Prakasam Salai,

Chennai – 600 108.                                               .. Respondent /Opposite party.

 

Counsel for Appellant      : M/s. K. Subradeepan

Counsel for Respondent  : M/s. Nageswaran & Narichania

            

           This appeal coming up before us for hearing finally today, this commission made the following order in open court:

                                                   Docket Order

         No representation for appellant.   Respondent present.   Appellant also called absent.  During the past two hearings also, there was no representation for appellant.  Therefore, the matter was adjourned to this date for appearance of appellant and for filing written arguments of appellant as last chance and for arguments. Written arguments of the appellant also not filed.  Sufficient opportunities given.  Today it is posted as last chance, but there is no representation for the appellant.  Appellant is also called absent, thereby showing that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case.  Therefore no useful purpose will be served in keeping the appeal on file.

Hence, the appeal is dismissed for default. 

 

           Sd/-                                                         Sd/-                                          Sd/-

S.M.LATHAMAHESWARI                K.BASKARAN                              S.TAMILVANAN    

            MEMBER                             JUDL. MEMBER                               PRESIDENT

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Dr. S. TAMILVANAN]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. K BASKARAN]
JUDICIAL MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. TMT.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESHWARI]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.