Chandigarh

DF-II

CC/264/2011

Rajesh Goel - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Nirvana Cooperataive House Building (First), Society Ltd., - Opp.Party(s)

Munish Goel

04 Oct 2012

ORDER


CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019
CONSUMER CASE NO. 264 of 2011
1. Rajesh GoelS/o Gokal Chand Goel, R/o 21, Victoria Road, Papatoetoe, Auckland, New Zealand and also resident of 1085 ZL, Ambala Road, Kalka and also through his General Power of attorney sanjeev Kumar Gupta S/o Sh. Mohan Lal gupta R/o H. No. 234-B, Sector 43 A, Chandigarh. ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. The Nirvana Cooperataive House Building (First), Society Ltd.,Flat No. 1722, Plot No. 48, Sector 49-B, Chandigarh Through its President/Secretary. ...........Respondent(s)


For the Appellant :Munish Goel, Advocate for
For the Respondent :

Dated : 04 Oct 2012
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM–II, U.T. CHANDIGARH

 

Consumer Complaint No.264 of 2011

 

 

Rajesh Goel           Vs.     The Nirvana Cooperative House Building                                              (First) Society Ltd.

 

PRESENT:

 

Sh.Munish Goel, Counsel for Complainant.

 

Dated the 4th day of October, 2012

 

ORDER

 

                        Affidavit of Rajesh Goel-complainant placed on record as Annexure Z.

                        Counsel for complainant has made the following statement, recorded separately:-

“The OP has redressed the part grievance of the complainant. In these circumstances, the complaint needs substantial amendment. Therefore, the complainant does not want to pursue this complaint. However, he reserves his right to file a fresh complaint on the same cause of action against the grievances which are not redressed. So, at the instructions of the complainant given to me vide affidavit Annexure Z, I do not press this complaint at this stage. It be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh complaint on the same cause of action.”

 

                         In view of the above statement of counsel for complainant, this complaint is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh complaint on the same cause of action, as per law.

                        Certified copy of this order be communicated to the parties free of cost. After compliance file be consigned.

          Sd/-                                                             Sd/-

(JASWINDER SINGH SIDHU)                                           (LAKSHMAN SHARMA)          

            MEMBER                                                                      PRESIDENT

 


MR. JASWINDER SINGH SIDHU, MEMBERHONABLE MR. LAKSHMAN SHARMA, PRESIDENT ,