Tamil Nadu

Thiruvallur

2011/35

E.Shanmugam - Complainant(s)

Versus

The New India Assurance Company Ltd & Others - Opp.Party(s)

E.S.Murali

28 Jan 2016

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
THIRUVALLUR
No.1-D, C.V.NAIDU SALAI, 1st CROSS STREET,
THIRUVALLUR-602 001
 
Complaint Case No. 2011/35
 
1. E.Shanmugam
Chitoor Road, Thiruthani-631 209
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The New India Assurance Company Ltd & Others
Moore Street, Ch-1
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  THIRU.S.PANDIAN, B.Sc., L.L.M., PRESIDENT
  Tmt.S.Sujatha, B.Sc., MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:E.S.Murali, Advocate
For the Opp. Party: M/s V.Murali, Advocate
ORDER

                                                                                                                                 Date of Filling     : 16.09.2011.

                                                                                       Date of Disposal : 28.01.2016.

 

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, THIRUVALLUR - 1.

 

PRESENT:         THIRU. S.  PANDIAN, B.Sc., L.L.M.,       …    PRESIDENT

                   TMT. S.  SUJATHA, B.Sc.,                         …    MEMBER - I

 

C.C.35/2011

 

(Thursday the 28th day of January 2016)

 

E. Shanmugam,

No.63, Chitoor Road,

Thiruthani - 631 209.                                                                   … Complainant.

                   

/ Versus /

1. The Chairman, representing

    UTI Infrastruture Technology and Services Limited,

    Plot no.3, Sector 11, CBD Belapur,

    Navi Mumbai- 400 614.

 

2. The Chairman, representing

    UTI Technologies Services Ltd.,

    No.45, Justice Bashee Ahmed Building,

    2nd Floor, 2nd Line Beach,

    Chennai - 600 001.

 

3. The Chairman, representing,

    The New India Assuranace Company Limited,

    No.87, Mahathma Gandhi Road,

    Fort,  Mumbai- 400 001.

 

4. The Chairman, representing

    The New India Assurance Company Ltd.,

    Divisional Office - 710100,

    5th Floor, 45, Moore Street,

    Chennai - 600 001.                                                             … Opposite Parties.

 

Counsel for the Complainant                       : Thiru. E.S. Murali

Counsel for the 1st & 2nd Opposite parties  : Thiru. V. Murali

Counsel for the 3rd & 4th Opposite parties  : Thiru. V. Kishore Reddy and

                                                                          Thiru. E. Vijayakumar.

ORDER

            Proof Affidavit of the complainant not filed, even posted today as NFA and given so many opportunities.  Complainant is called absent.  No other representation.  It shows the disinterest of the complainant in this case.  Therefore, there is no justification to prolong the matter further without any progress.   Moreover, it is a long pending which is more than 5 years.

Passed it over

At 12:15 P.M

            Complainant is again called absent.  No other representation.  Hence, complaint is Dismissed for Default.   No cost.

 

Sd/-***                                                                                                Sd/-***           

 

MEMBER I                                                                                        PRESIDENT

 
 
[ THIRU.S.PANDIAN, B.Sc., L.L.M.,]
PRESIDENT
 
[ Tmt.S.Sujatha, B.Sc.,]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.