Chandigarh

DF-I

EA/2/2010

Jagmohan Singh Oberoi S/o Sh. Harbhajan Singh Oberoi Aged 63 Years C/o 424 Sector-16 panchkula - Complainant(s)

Versus

The New India Assurance Company Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

19 Feb 2010

ORDER


CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM - I Plot No 5- B, Sector 19 B, Madhya Marg, Chandigarh - 160 019
EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 2 of 2010
1. Jagmohan Singh Oberoi S/o Sh. Harbhajan Singh Oberoi Aged 63 Years C/o 424 Sector-16 panchkulaPanchkula ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. The New India Assurance Company Ltd.Regd. office & Haed Office: New India Assurance Bldg. 87, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Fort Mumbai-4000012. The New India Insurance CompanyLtd. SCO No. 804 NAC Manimajra Chandigarh through its Branch Manager-cum-Principal Officer ...........Respondent(s)


For the Appellant :
For the Respondent :

Dated : 19 Feb 2010
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HELD IN DISTRICT FORUM-I, U.T.

CHANDIGARH

 

                                                                                                                                                Execution Application No.2 of 2010

in

Complaint Case No.141 of 2004

 

Jagmohan Singh Oberoi      Applicant/Complainant

 

                        Versus

 

1.         The New India Assurance Co. Ltd, Mumbai    OP No.1.

2.         The New India Insurance Company Ltd., Chandigarh – OP No.2.

 

Present:         Sh.Mohit Malik, Adv. for Sh.Atul Sharma, Advocate for Applicant/Complainant.   

                        Sh.Rajneesh Malhotra, Advocate for OPs.

 

Dated, the 19th day of February, 2010.

                                                            ORDER

 

                        In view of the statement made by counsel for the complainant, this execution application is dismissed as withdrawn. The complainant would be at liberty to file afresh execution application as & when the stay order is vacated by the Hon’ble National Commission or after the decision of RP No.3040 of 2008, if need be.

                        Copies of this order free of cost be supplied to the parties. The file be consigned.

                                                                                                PRESIDING OFFICER

            LOK ADALAT

 

 

 

                                    2nd MEMBER                                   1st MEMBER

 


DR. MADHU BEHL, MEMBERHONABLE MR. JAGROOP SINGH MAHAL, PRESIDENT ,