DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, ANANTAPUR.

PRESENT:- Sri S.Chinnaiah, B.A., B.L., President

      Smt.S.Lalitha, M.A., M.L., Lady Member

Tuesday, the 24^th day of June, 2008

C.C.NO.115/2007

Between:-

           Smt.Shaik Nigar Banu

           W/o Late Shaik Nisar

           @ Shaik Basheer

           D.No.1-689-9

           Khajanagar, Kadiri,

           Anantapur District.                                                           ….   Complainant

Vs.     

         1. The Divisional Manager

             The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.,

              69/70, Sheikpet, Nadu Street

              Kancheepuram – 632 501

              Tamil Nadu.

         2.    Smt.Shaik Nigar Bhanu

                Smt.S.Salma Begum

                W/o Late Shaik Nisar

                @ Late Shaik Basheer

          3.   S.Nisar Ahamad

                S/o Late Shaik Nisar

          4.   S.Basheera Banu

                D/o Late Shaik Nisar

                3 & 4 are minors rep. by guardian &

                next friend 2^nd  opposite party

                All are residing near Mosque,

                Valisab Road, Kadiri,

                Anantapur District.                                                   … Opposite Parties

          *(As per orders vide I.A.No.102/08 dt.24-06-2008,

             the name of the 2^nd opposite party is amended

             as  Smt.Shaik Nigar Bhanu).

            This case coming on this day for final hearing before us in the presence of Sri M.Ravichandra Rao, advocate for the complainant and Sri N.R.K.Mohan, advocate for the 1^st opposite party and Sri B.Vijaya Kumar,Sri L.Rajiv Reddy and Sri V.Rajasekhar, advocates for the opposite parties 2 to 4 and after perusing the material papers on record, the Forum delivered the following:

DOCKET  O R D E R

            Both parties and their counsels are present before the Forum and filed Joint Memo stating that the complainant i.e. Smt.Shaik Nigar Bhanu is not pressing her claim of Insurance amount and admitted that the 2^nd respondent/2^nd opposite party is alone the wife of late Shaik Nissar.  The petitioner/complainant has no objection for payment of Insurance amount by the 1^st respondent/1^st opposite party to the 2^nd respondent/2^nd opposite party i.e. Smt.Shaik Nigar Bhanu wife of late Shaik Nissar. The petitioner/complainant and the respondents/opposite parties 2 to 4 both agreed not to file criminal, civil or any type of cases against each other in future.  The terms of compromise memo is explained to the both parties and they have conceded for the same.  In view of terms of compromise memo, the 1^st opposite party/Insurance Company is directed to deposit the Insurance Policy amount of Rs.2,00,000/- into the court within one month from the date of this order.

            Hence, Joint Memo filed by both parties is recorded.

            The petitioner/complainant has no objection to close the main complaint.  Accordingly, the complaint is closed.

                         Sd/-                                                             Sd/-

               LADY MEMBER                                             PRESIDENT 

DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM,                DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM,

                 ANANTAPUR                                               ANANTAPUR

Typed by JPNN