O R A L O R D E R
Per Mr.B.A.Shaikh, Hon`ble Presiding Judicial Member.
1. This application is made by the original applicants requesting that the CC.No.307/2000 be taken up for hearing for disposal of according to law. We have heard Adv. Sanjay Mundhe appearing for the appellant and Adv. M.M.Ambhore is appearing for the respondent No. 1. None is present for the respondent No. 2 though served.
2. We have also called record and proceeding of original complaint No. 307/2000 and we have perused the same. It is submitted by the advocate of the applicant that the said CC.No.307/2000 was filed before the Hon’ble State Commission, Mumbai and it was transferred to Circuit Bench, Aurangabad after its establishment in the year 2007 and that on 18/02/2008 Adv.Shri.Karadkhedkar had made wrong submission in that complaint before this Commission that the said complaint has been already disposed on 11/04/2000. He further submitted that on the basis of said wrong submission, the proceeding of the complaint has been closed by this Commission as per order dated 18/02/2008. He also submitted that Adv.Shri.Karadkhedkar was not appointed by the respondent No. 1 and no such order was passed on 11/04/2000, in that complaint. He also submitted that the complaint was filed after 11/04/2000 before the State Commission Mumbai i.e. on 24/07/2000 and therefore there was no question of passing any order in that complaint on 11/04/2000. He therefore requested that as this Commission relying on the submission of Adv. Karadkhedkar under misconception closed the proceedings of the said complaint, it may be taken up for hearing after reopening of the proceedings.
3. Adv.Shri.M.M.Ambhore appeared for the respondent No. 1 also conceded to the aforesaid request made by the applicant’s advocate. He also suibmitted that Adv. Karadkhedkar was not appointed by the respondent and therefore he had no authority to make any such submission before this Commission on 18/02/2008. He also submitted that said complaint is still pending and necessary order as deem fit may be passed in this regard.
4. The perusal of the record and proceeding of CC.No.307/2000 shows that said complaint was filed before the Hon’ble State Commission on 24/07/2000 and it came tobe transferred to this Commission in the year 2007 when this Circuit Bench was established.
5. The Registry of this Circuit Bench issued notice to both the parties on 16/12/2007 and both the parties were directed to appear before this Commission on 18/02/2008. The complaint was taken up for hearing on 18/02/2008 for the first time before this Commission. On that date advocate Karadkhedkar had appeared on behalf of the opponent No. 1 ( respondent No. 1) and made submission that the complaint has been already disposed of as per judgment and order dated 11/04/2000. On the basis of his submission this Commission closed the proceeding of the complaint on that date. However, no V.P. was filed by the advocate of Karadkhedkar on behalf of opponent No. 1 in this complaint. It is not known as to how Adv. Karadkhedkar appeared before this Commission on 18/02/2008 and made aforesaid submission on behalf of opponent No.1. Moreover, no copy of such judgment and order dated 11/04/2000 was produced before this Commission by him. The perusal of the entire record and proceeding of the said appeal shows that the said complaint is till pending. Moreover, there is no question to decide that the complaint on 11/04/2000 when the complaint was filed before the State Commission, Mumbai on 24/07/2000. Hence, we hold that this Commission was misled by Adv. Karadkhedkar on 18/02/2008 which resulted in to erroneous closing of the proceedings of the said complaint. Therefore we hold that the said proceeding requires tobe reopened and the said complaint needs to be decided in accordance with law. Hence order.
O R D E R
1. The application is granted.
2. The proceedings of the C.C.No. 307/2000 be reopened for hearing in that complaint according to law. This order be tagged with record and proceeding of CC.No.307/2000 and said complaint be taken up for hearing on 14/01/2013. Both parties shall appear before this Commission on 14/01/2003 in that complaint.
3. Copies of this order be issued to both the parties.