Uttar Pradesh

StateCommission

A/733/2024

Mohd Sadik - Complainant(s)

Versus

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. & Anothers - Opp.Party(s)

Satish Chandra Srivastava & Vipin Verma & Vichitra Pandey

05 Jun 2024

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UP
C-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010
 
First Appeal No. A/733/2024
( Date of Filing : 27 May 2024 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated 23/02/2024 in Case No. CC/832/2019 of District Lucknow-I)
 
1. Mohd Sadik
m. m. i. ji 95 sector c s.b.i colony jankipurm lko
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. & Anothers
chetriya prabandhak office 6 floor jivan bhawan 2nd nawal kisor road hazratganj lko
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PRESIDENT
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 05 Jun 2024
Final Order / Judgement

ORAL

 

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UTTAR PRADESH, LUCKNOW

 

 

APPEAL NO. 733 OF 2024

Mohd. Sadiq Vs The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.

 

 

BEFORE:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR, PRESIDENT

 

Dated : 05-06-2024

ORDER

BY HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR, PRESIDENT

 

This is an appeal filed by the appellant against the impugned order dated 23-02-2024 passed by the learned District Consumer Commission First, Lucknow in Complaint Case No. 832/2019 by which the aforesaid complaint has been dismissed for non-appearance of the complainant.

Sri Satish Chandra Srivastava, learned counsel for the appellant appeared.    

Appeal has been filed with delay condonation application.  Appellant has shown sufficient reasons for the delay in filing the appeal. Cause shown for delay is explained, therefore, the delay is condoned.

I have heard learned counsel for the appellant at the admission stage itself and perused the impugned order as well as record.

I have also gone through the memo of appeal and have considered the submission made by learned Counsel for the appellant. The appellant has given sufficient reasons for his absence.

 

-2-

 

Seeing the peculiar facts and circmstances, I am of the opinion that an opportunity ought to have been allowed to the appellant/complainant to pursue his case before the Learned District Consumer Commission on merit.

The order impugned passed by the Learned District Consumer Commission is hereby set-aside. The Learned District Consumer Commission is requested to restore the complaint case no. 832/2019; Mohd. Sadik Vs The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. to its original number and deciding the same after providing an opportunity of hearing to the parties positively  within a period of one year from today. It is made clear that unnecessary adjournments will not be allowed to either of the parties by the Learned District Consumer Commission.

A copy of this order will be served by the appellant before the Learned District Consumer Commission First, Lucknow within a period of four weeks from today.        

          Let copy of this order be made available to the parties as per rules.

The Stenographer is requested to upload this order on the website of this Commission at the earliest. 

 

 

                          (JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR)                               

                                       PRESIDENT                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               

Ashish

Court-1

    

 

        

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR]
PRESIDENT
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.