Order No.3                 Date: 03.06.2022

Ld. Advocate for the complainant is present.

Heard the submission of Ld. Advocate. It appears from the Annexure ‘D’ that there was an agreement between the owner Hussain Ali and the Md. Muktar Ahmed Ansari. It was agreed that the second party will pay monthly rent of Rs.70,000/- to 1^st party for using vehicle of the first  party vide vehicle no.WB 65B 7912.  Thereafter second party violate the terms of the agreement as a result the first party lodged a complaint before  the Baishnabnagar P.S., District of Malda U/S420 /406 /34 IPC. That complaint is still pending. In this complaint case, complainant made a complaint against the New India Assurance Co. Ltd. for nonpayment of insurance money on the ground that the alleged car has been theft but it appears from the FIR and the bilateral agreement dated 12/08/2020, that the story of theft is not correct. This is a dispute between the parties and the case is pending for violation of the terms of the agreement. So complainant is not a consumer under C.P. Act and there is no cause of action against the complainant files this case.

                                             Hence, this complaint case is rejected.