Maharashtra

StateCommission

MA/10/246

MR SURYAKANT VASUDEO PAWASKAR - Complainant(s)

Versus

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD & ORS - Opp.Party(s)

Subodh Gokhale

14 Jan 2011

ORDER

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL
COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAI
 
Miscellaneous Application No. MA/10/246
 
1. MR SURYAKANT VASUDEO PAWASKAR
Residing A/P Golap, Hanuman Wadi, Above Golap Mosque, Tal. Ratnagiri, Dist. Ratnagiri
Ratnagiri
Maharastra
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD & ORS
Through its Branch Manager, The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Branch Ratnagiri, Javkar Plaza, Jay Stambh, Ratnagiri, Dist. Ratnagir
Ratnagiri
Maharastra
2. Ratnagiri Zilla Madhyavarti Sahakari Bank Ltd.,
Through its Branch Manager, Head Office, Jawahar Path, Ratnagiri, Dist. Ratnagiri, Maharashtra
Ratnagiri
Maharashtra
3. Shri. Parshuram Machhimar Seva Sahakari Society Ltd.,
Through Chairman A/P Pawas, Kharavi Wadi, Tal. Ratnagiri, Dist. Ratnagiri.
Ratnagiri
Maharashtra.
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 Hon'ble Mr. P.N. Kashalkar PRESIDING MEMBER
 Hon'ble Mrs. S.P.Lale Member
 
PRESENT:Subodh Gokhale, Advocate for the Appellant 1
 
Mr.M.M. Mahajan, Advocate for the respondent No1.
None for respondent Nos.2&3.
......for the Respondent
ORDER

Per Shri P.N. Kashalkar, Hon’ble Presiding Judicial Member

          Heard.  There is delay of 14 days in filing this appeal.  For seeking condonation of delay, Misc. Application No.246/2010 has been filed supported by the affidavit.  In the condonation of delay application, sufficient cause has been mentioned.  Delay is of few days.  Delay is not intentional or deliberate.  In the interest of justice, we think it proper to condone the delay for the causes that are mentioned by the appellant in the condonation of delay application.  Those causes are held to be sufficient one within meaning of Section 24-A of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.  Hence, we pass the following order :-

                              -: ORDER :-

1.       Misc. Application No.246/2010 is allowed.

2.       Delay is condoned subject to cost of `500/- payable by the applicant only to the contesting respondent No.1/Insurance Company.

 

 
 
[Hon'ble Mr. P.N. Kashalkar]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
[Hon'ble Mrs. S.P.Lale]
Member

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.