Rajesh Chandra Patnaik filed a consumer case on 31 May 2023 against The M/s Hindustan Sales Pvt Ltd., in the Rayagada Consumer Court. The case no is CC/210/2021 and the judgment uploaded on 08 Aug 2023.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION RAYAGADA, ODISHA.
Date of Institution: 10.12.2021
Date of Final Hearing: 24.05.2023
Date of Pronouncement: 31.05.2023
CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO.210 / 2021
Rajesh Chandra Patnaik, C/O: Rama Chandra Patnaik,
Near Laxmi Ganesh Rice Mill, Tumbiguda,
Post/Dist: Rayagada, 765 001. Cell No. 9437646809.
(Represented in person) …Complainant
Versus
1.The Manager, M/S. Hindustan Sales Pvt. Ltd., Gandhi Chowk,
At/P0: Jeypore, Dist: Koraput, Odisha, pin No. 764 001.
(None for the O.Ps. ).
2.The Manager, M/S. Hyundai Motor India Ltd.,
Eastern Regional Office-I, Infinity Benchmark, 8th. Floor,
Block EP & GP, Sec-V, Salt Lake, Kolkata-700091.
(None for the O.Ps. ). … Opposite Parties
Present: 1. Sri Rajendra Kumar Panda, President.
ORDER U/S- 39 R/W SECTION- 64 OF THE C.P.ACT,2019
Sri Rajendra Kumar Panda, President |
Brief facts of the case:-
Case in hand is the allegation of deficiency in service and unfair trade practice by the O.Ps for non replacement of 4 wheeler Car within warranty period which the complainant sought redressal.
The Back ground facts in a nutshell are that the complainant had purchased a 4 wheeler Car 120 ASTA (O) 1.2 Kappa MT from the O.P. No.1 (Dealer) on Dtd.26.08.2021 bearing Invoice No.HUN-VS/204/21-22 on payment of consideration an amount a sum of Rs.9,41,200/-. Severe rusting and junk was observed in the front wheel and brake assembly components with in 10 days of car delivery. The vehicle was inspected by M/S. HSPL Service team at their Bhawanipatna service centre during Ist. Servicing on Dt. 29th. October, 2021 for routine check up. Rusting and junk complaint was informed to M/S. Hyundai through M/S. HSPL during Ist. Servicing as well as through Mail Dtd. 2.11.2021, 16.11.2021, 19.11.2021 as well as through app based complaint ID 1- 4393894400 but did not get any satisfactory reponse from the O.Ps. As rusting and junk has been observed in visible components the complainant is serious doubt that it will affect other critical components of Car leading to premature failure, abnormal operating condition, poor performance & high potential safety threat to passengers, requesting O.Ps to replace the vehicle 4 wheeler with a new one defect free Car. During the warranty period the above 4 wheeler was found defective. Inspite of repeated complaints through E-mail to the O.Ps, the O.Ps had paid deaf ear to the genuine complaint. Hence, the complainant finding no option has approached this Commission to get relief and prayed direct the O.Ps to replacement of 4 wheeler with a new one defect free set with interest and compensation. Hence this complaint.
The O.Ps were not appeared though notices has been duly served resultant made exparte.
Heard from the complainant. Perused the record, affidavit and other documents filed by the parties.
Basing on the pleadings of the complainant, this commission framed the following issues for determination.
ISSUES:-
Perused the complaint petition as well as the documents filed by the complainant including self attested Xerox copies Tax Invoice which was issued by the O.Ps in favour of the complainant Marked as Annexure-I .Issue No.1.
As per Section 2(7)(i) & (ii) of C.P. Act, 2019 a person can be deemed to be a consumer when he hires or avails of any services for consideration which has been paid or promised to be paid. In the instant case the complainant had purchased the 4 wheeler Car from the O.P. No.1 on payment of consideration of Rs.9, 41,200/- on Dated. 26.08.2021 which was issued by the O.Ps in favour of the complainant. Therefore the complainant falls within the definition of consumer.
In view of the discussion above, the complainant is a Consumer under the O.Ps as envisaged U/S-2(7) ( i) & (ii) of C.P. Act, 2019.
Accordingly issue No. 1 is answered.
Issue No.2 & 3 .
These two issues invite common discussion and hence they are being taken up together.
We perused the documents filed by the complainant and it proves that the complainant has purchased a 4 wheeler Car from the O.P. No.1 and after its purchase within 10 days the above vehicle was found severe rusting, junk of front wheel and brake assembly components and the O.Ps service centre failed to replacement of the rusting and junk parts.. At the time of selling their products the O.Ps ensure that they would provide after sale service to the consumer but in this case the O.Ps sold their product and failed to give after sale service which is clear deficiency in service on the part of the O.Ps.
At this stage we hold that if the above product require service immediately after its purchase then it can be presumed that it is manufacturing defect and if a defective product is supplied , the consumer is entitled to get refund of the price of the product/article or to replace a new one and also the consumer is entitled and has a right to claim compensation and cost to meet his mental agony, financial loss.
In the instant case as it appears that the above product which was purchased by the complainant had developed defects immediately after its purchase and the O.Ps were unable to restore its normal functioning during the warranty period.
It appears that the complainant invested a substantial amount and had purchased above product with an expectation to have the effective benefit of use of the product, but in this case the complainant was deprived of getting beneficial use of the vehicle and deprived of in using the above vehicle. The defects were not rectified/replaced by the O.Ps.
In the present case the O.Ps are jointly and severally liable.
Hence it is ordered.
ORDER.
The O.Ps are directed to replace the severe rusting, junk of front wheel and brake assembly components and also effected parts of the 4 wheeler Car bearing Regd. No.OD-08-S-0279 with new parts defect free set with fresh warranty from the date of replacement to the full satisfaction of the complainant without charging any price. Further the O.Ps are directed to give a full service to the said vehicle and to rectify all the defects in the said vehicle without charging any price to the complainant .
The entire directions shall be carried out with in 45 days by the O.Ps from the date of receipt of this order failing which the O.Ps shall bear Rs.20,000/- for non compliance of the order as per the direction.
Miscellaneous order if any delivered by this commission relating to this case stands vacated.
Pronounced in the open court of this Commission today on this 31st. Day of May, 2023 under the seal & signature of this Commission.
Dictated and corrected by me.
PRESIDENT
A copy of this order be provided to all the parties at free of cost as mandated by the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 or they may download same from the confonet.nic.in to treat the same as if copy of order received from this Commission.
The judgment be uploaded forthwith on the website of the Commission for the perusal of the parties.
File be consigned to the record room along with a copy of this Judgment.
PRESIDENT
PRONOUNCED ON Dated.31.05.2023
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.