The Mobile Store Ltd V/S Agam Pal Singh - Consumer Court Case

Punjab

Bhatinda

CC/09/200

Agam Pal Singh - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Mobile Store Ltd - Opp.Party(s)

Sh.N.P.Singh Advocate

13 Oct 2009

ORDER

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bathinda (Punjab)
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Govt. House No. 16-D, Civil Station, Near SSP Residence, Bathinda-151 001
consumer case(CC) No. CC/09/200

Agam Pal Singh						...........Appellant(s)
Vs.
The Mobile Store Ltd Hindtel Communication through its Incharge. Nokia India Pvt Ltd (Nokia TMC Ltd)						...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:

Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):

OppositeParty/Respondent(s):

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended

Highly recommended!

5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended

Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

Statement of Sh.Sukhdev Mittal,counsel for the opposite party No.3 W.O. Stated that opposite party No.3 is readyl to make the payment of Rs.7969/- (Rupees Seven Thousand Nine Hundred and Sixty Nine Only) for mobile set in question which was purchased by the complainant on 14.11.2008 within 20 days from today against original Job Sheet dt.1.8.09. RO&AC Member Member President, D.C.F. 13.10.09. Statement of Sh.N.P.Singh,counsel for the complainant W.O. Stated that I accept the offer of opposite party No.3 as stated by Sh.Sukhdev Milttal,counsel for opposite party No.3. In view of the statement of Sh.Sukhdev Mittal, I may kindly be allow to withdraw the complaint. RO&AC Member Member President, D.C.F. 13.10.09. 13.10.09 Present:Sh.N.P.Singh, counsel for the complainant. Sh.Sanjay Goyal,counsel for opposite party No.2. Sh.Sukhdev Mittal,counsel for opposite party No.3. Opposite party No.1 already exparte. Parties have made the above statements they are bound by them. In view of statements of the learned counsel for the parties, the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. File be consigned. Member Member President, D.C.F.

Statement of Sh.Sukhdev Mittal,counsel for the opposite party No.3 W.O. Stated that opposite party No.3 is readyl to make the payment of Rs.7969/- (Rupees Seven Thousand Nine Hundred and Sixty Nine Only) for mobile set in question which was purchased by the complainant on 14.11.2008 within 20 days from today against original Job Sheet dt.1.8.09. RO&AC Member Member President, D.C.F. 13.10.09. Statement of Sh.N.P.Singh,counsel for the complainant W.O. Stated that I accept the offer of opposite party No.3 as stated by Sh.Sukhdev Milttal,counsel for opposite party No.3. In view of the statement of Sh.Sukhdev Mittal, I may kindly be allow to withdraw the complaint. RO&AC Member Member President, D.C.F. 13.10.09. 13.10.09 Present:Sh.N.P.Singh, counsel for the complainant. Sh.Sanjay Goyal,counsel for opposite party No.2. Sh.Sukhdev Mittal,counsel for opposite party No.3. Opposite party No.1 already exparte. Parties have made the above statements they are bound by them. In view of statements of the learned counsel for the parties, the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. File be consigned. Member Member President, D.C.F.